首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Chinese Medical Journal >Desflurane anesthesia compared with total intravenous anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled operating room time in ambulatory surgery following strabotomy: a randomized controlled study
【2h】

Desflurane anesthesia compared with total intravenous anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled operating room time in ambulatory surgery following strabotomy: a randomized controlled study

机译:地氟虫病非卧式麻醉与全静脉麻醉相比在非手术方式下进行卧床手术的麻醉控制手术室时间:一项随机对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ophthalmic ambulatory surgery is preferred to be performed under general anesthesia either by total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or by inhalational anesthesia to increase the patient comfort. However, anesthesia-controlled time (ACT) can cause increased non-operative operating room (OR) time which may adversely affect the ORs efficiency. This study was aimed to compare the ACT of desflurane with that of propofol-remifentanil in strabismus ambulatory surgery.
机译:眼科门诊手术最好在全身麻醉下通过全静脉麻醉(TIVA)或通过吸入麻醉进行,以增加患者的舒适度。但是,麻醉控制时间(ACT)会导致非手术室(OR)时间增加,这可能会对ORs效率产生不利影响。这项研究旨在比较斜视非卧床手术中地氟醚与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号