首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of Three Techniques for Detection of Low-Level Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a Disk Diffusion Method with Cefoxitin and Moxalactam the Vitek 2 System and the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test
【2h】

Evaluation of Three Techniques for Detection of Low-Level Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a Disk Diffusion Method with Cefoxitin and Moxalactam the Vitek 2 System and the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test

机译:评价三种检测低水平耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的技术:头孢西丁和莫拉西坦Vitek 2系统和MRSA筛选乳胶凝集试验的圆盘扩散法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Very-low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), or class 1 MRSA, is often misdiagnosed as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We evaluated the performances of three methods for detection of low-level methicillin resistance: the disk diffusion method using the cephamycin antibiotics cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux), and the MRSA-screen test (Denka). Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was considered to be the “gold standard.” We also determined the sensitivity of the oxacillin disk diffusion method with 5- and 1-μg disks and that of the Oxascreen agar assay with 6 mg of oxacillin liter−1 for detection of MRSA. We compared the distributions of MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin by the E-test (AB Biodisk), and those of moxalactam by dilutions in agar, for MRSA and MSSA isolates. The 152 clinical isolates of S. aureus studied were divided into 69 MSSA (mecA-negative) and 83 MRSA (mecA-positive) isolates, including 63 heterogeneous isolates and 26 class 1 isolates (low-level resistance). The cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion tests detected 100% of all the MRSA classes: cefoxitin inhibition zone diameters were <27 mm, and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters were <24 mm. The Vitek 2 system and the MRSA-screen test detected 94 and 97.6% of all MRSA isolates, respectively. The sensitivities of the 5- and 1-μg oxacillin disks were 95.2 and 96.4%, respectively, whereas that of the Oxascreen agar screen assay was 94%. All of the tests except the 1-μg oxacillin disk test were 100% specific. For the class 1 MRSA isolates, the sensitivity of the Vitek 2 test was 92.3%, whereas those of the MRSA-screen test and the disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam were 100%. Therefore, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods were the best-performing tests for routine detection of all classes of MRSA.
机译:极低水平的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)或1类MRSA通常被误诊为对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)。我们评估了三种检测低水平甲氧西林耐药性的方法的性能:使用头孢霉素抗生素头孢西丁和莫拉西坦的圆盘扩散法,Vitek 2系统(bioMérieux)和MRSA筛查法(Denka)。通过PCR检测mecA基因被认为是“黄金标准”。我们还确定了使用5和1μg盘的奥沙西林盘扩散法和使用6 mg的奥沙西林升 -1 进行Oxascreen琼脂分析的敏感性,以检测MRSA。对于MRSA和MSSA分离株,我们通过E检验(AB Biodisk)比较了奥沙西林和头孢西丁的MIC分布,以及通过琼脂稀释对莫西内酰胺的MIC分布。研究的152株金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株分为69株MSSA(mecA阴性)和83株MRSA(mecA阳性),包括63株异源分离株和26株1级分离株(低水平耐药性)。头孢西丁和莫拉西坦纸片扩散测试检测到所有MRSA类型中的100%:头孢西丁抑制区直径<27 mm,莫拉西坦抑制区直径<24 mm。 Vitek 2系统和MRSA筛选测试分别检测到所有MRSA分离株的94和97.6%。 5-μg和1-μg的奥沙西林片的敏感性分别为95.2%和96.4%,而Oxascreen琼脂筛选试验的敏感性为94%。除1μg奥沙西林纸片测试外,所有测试均为100%特异的。对于1类MRSA分离株,Vitek 2试验的敏感性为92.3%,而MRSA筛选试验和头孢西丁和莫拉内酰胺的圆盘扩散法的敏感性为100%。因此,头孢西丁和莫拉西坦纸片扩散法是常规检测所有类别的MRSA的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号