首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of a Multiplex Reverse Transcription-PCR-Enzyme Hybridization Assay with Conventional Viral Culture and Immunofluorescence Techniques for the Detection of Seven Viral Respiratory Pathogens
【2h】

Comparison of a Multiplex Reverse Transcription-PCR-Enzyme Hybridization Assay with Conventional Viral Culture and Immunofluorescence Techniques for the Detection of Seven Viral Respiratory Pathogens

机译:多重逆转录-PCR-酶杂交检测与常规病毒培养和免疫荧光技术检测七种病毒性呼吸道病原体的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A multiplex reverse transcription-PCR-enzyme hybridization assay (RT-PCR-EHA; Hexaplex; Prodesse Inc., Waukesha, Wis.) was used for the simultaneous detection of human parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3, influenza virus types A and B, and respiratory syncytial virus types A and B. One hundred forty-three respiratory specimens from 126 patients were analyzed by RT-PCR-EHA, and the results were compared to those obtained by conventional viral culture and immunofluorescence (IF) methods. RT-PCR-EHA proved to be positive for 17 of 143 (11.9%) specimens, whereas 8 of 143 (5.6%) samples were positive by viral culture and/or IF. Eight samples were positive by both RT-PCR-EHA and conventional methods, while nine samples were RT-PCR-EHA positive and viral culture and IF negative. Eight of the nine samples with discordant results were then independently tested by a different multiplex RT-PCR assay for influenza virus types A and B, and all eight proved to be positive. In comparison to viral culture and IF methods, RT-PCR-EHA gave a sensitivity and a specificity of 100 and 93%, respectively. Since RT-PCR-EHA was able to detect more positive samples, which would otherwise have been missed by routine methods, we suggest that this multiplex RT-PCR-EHA provides a highly sensitive and specific means of diagnostic detection of major respiratory viruses.
机译:多重逆转录-PCR-酶杂交试验(RT-PCR-EHA; Hexaplex; Prodesse Inc.,威斯康星州,威斯康星州)用于同时检测人副流感病毒1、2和3型,A型流感病毒RT-PCR-EHA对126例患者的143个呼吸道标本进行了分析,并将结果与​​常规病毒培养和免疫荧光(IF)方法进行了比较。经病毒培养和/或IF证实,RT-PCR-EHA对143个样本中的17个(11.9%)为阳性,而143个样本中的8个(5.6%)为阳性。 RT-PCR-EHA和常规方法均为8份阳性,而RT-PCR-EHA为9份,病毒培养和IF均为阳性。然后,通过不同的多重RT-PCR分析法分别对9种结果不一致的样品中的8种针对甲型和B型流感病毒进行了独立测试,所有八种均被证实为阳性。与病毒培养和IF方法相比,RT-PCR-EHA的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和93%。由于RT-PCR-EHA能够检测更多阳性样品,而常规方法可能会漏掉更多阳性样品,因此我们建议这种多重RT-PCR-EHA提供主要检测呼吸道病毒的高灵敏度和特异性手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号