首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Explaining the Gap Between the Ambitious Goals and Practical Reality of Animal Welfare Law Enforcement: A Review of the Enforcement Gap in Australia
【2h】

Explaining the Gap Between the Ambitious Goals and Practical Reality of Animal Welfare Law Enforcement: A Review of the Enforcement Gap in Australia

机译:解释动物福利执法的宏伟目标与现实之间的差距:澳大利亚的执法差距回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Animal cruelty or neglect is an emotive social issue. Animal welfare legislation is the primary tool for defining, penalizing and hopefully deterring animal cruelty. A number of issues arising at all stages of the animal law enforcement process have been previously identified. These issues contribute to a discrepancy between the written law and the realities of the animal law enforcement process: the ‘enforcement gap’. This paper reviews the available resources to identify the causes of this ‘gap’. It is argued that the ‘gap’ is caused by numerous factors derived from all stages of the enforcement process: (1) reporting acts of animal cruelty, (2) ambiguity and shortcomings derived from the language used in animal welfare legislation (3) the nature of enforcement authorities, and (4) court determination on the matter. In order to reduce the enforcement gap and bring the expectations closer to reality, further research is needed.
机译:虐待或忽视动物行为是一个情绪化的社会问题。动物福利立法是定义,惩罚和希望阻止动物虐待的主要工具。先前已经确定了动物执法过程中各个阶段出现的许多问题。这些问题加剧了成文法与动物执法过程的现实之间的差异:“执法差距”。本文回顾了可用资源,以确定造成这种“差距”的原因。有人认为,“差距”是由执法过程中各个阶段产生的众多因素造成的:(1)报告动物虐待行为;(2)动物福利立法中使用的语言存在歧义和不足之处;(3)执法机构的性质,以及(4)法院对此事的裁定。为了缩小执法差距并使期望更接近现实,需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号