首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of Intestinal Protozoan Morphology in Human Fecal Specimens Preserved in EcoFix: Comparison of Wheatley’s Trichrome Stain and EcoStain
【2h】

Evaluation of Intestinal Protozoan Morphology in Human Fecal Specimens Preserved in EcoFix: Comparison of Wheatley’s Trichrome Stain and EcoStain

机译:评价保存在EcoFix中的人类粪便样本中肠道原生动物的形态:Wheatley的三色染色和EcoStain的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As a result of disposal problems related to the use of mercury compounds, many laboratories have switched from mercuric chloride-based Schaudinn’s and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) stool preservatives to other, non-mercury-based preservatives. A comparison of organism recoveries and morphologies of the intestinal protozoa was undertaken with PVA containing the EcoFix zinc-based Schaudinn’s preservative (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc.); both Wheatley’s modification of Gomori’s trichrome stain (WT) and EcoStain (ES) were used to stain 51 human fecal specimens. Morphology, clarity of nuclear and cytoplasmic detail, overall color differences, and the ease or difficulty in detecting intestinal protozoa in fecal debris were assessed for the two permanent stained smears. Overall, organism morphology of the intestinal protozoa stained with WT and that of protozoa stained with ES were not equal in nuclear and cytoplasmic detail or range of color. However, the same organisms were identified in stained fecal smears with either WT or ES, with the exception of situations in which organism numbers were characterized as rare. Included were 67 protozoan challenges (number of organisms): Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar (5), Entamoeba coli (9), Entamoeba hartmanni (6), Endolimax nana (12), Iodamoeba bütschlii (8), Blastocystis hominis (19), Giardia lamblia (6), Dientamoeba fragilis (2), yeast (2), and leukocytes (2). Five specimens were negative for parasites but contained fecal debris that was compared for morphologic detail and color range. The ES produces a more gray-green monotone with very little pink or red tone; contrast among the various colors is less than that seen with WT. Stain intensity for all organisms was acceptable, and there were no problems with stain deposition. The quality of the protozoan morphology with ES was often comparable to that with WT (36 of 67 [53.7%]) and, in some cases, better (24 of 67 [35.8%]). Organisms on the WT-stained smear exhibited better morphology in a few instances (4 of 67 [6%]), and in three instances, there were discrepant organism numbers.
机译:由于与使用汞化合物相关的处置问题,许多实验室已将基于氯化汞的沙丁胺和聚乙烯醇(PVA)粪便防腐剂改为其他基于非汞的防腐剂。用含有EcoFix锌基Schaudinn防腐剂(Meridian Diagnostics,Inc.)的PVA比较了肠道原生动物的生物回收率和形态。惠特利(Wheatley)对Gomori三色染色剂(WT)和EcoStain(ES)的修饰均用于染色51个人的粪便样本。对于两个永久性染色涂片,评估了形态学,核和细胞质细节的清晰度,总体颜色差异以及粪便碎片中肠道原生动物检测的难易程度。总体而言,WT染色的肠道原生动物的生物形态和ES染色的原生动物的生物形态在核和细胞质细节或颜色范围上不相等。但是,在用WT或ES染色的粪便涂片中可鉴定出相同的生物,但以生物体数量很少为特征的情况除外。其中包括67种原生动物挑战(生物数量):变形虫Entamoeba histolytica-Entamoeba dispar(5),Entamoeba coli(9),Entamoeba hartmanni(6),Endolimax nana(12),Iodamoebabütschlii(8),Blastocystis hominis(19),贾第鞭毛虫(6),脆弱的Dientamoeba(2),酵母(2)和白细胞(2)。五个标本对寄生虫呈阴性,但包含粪便残渣,将其进行形态学细节和颜色范围比较。 ES产生的灰绿色单调几乎没有粉红色或红色调。各种颜色之间的对比度小于WT所见的对比度。所有生物体的染色强度都是可以接受的,并且污渍沉积没有问题。 ES的原生动物形态质量通常与WT相当(67的67 [53.7%]),在某些情况下更好(67的24 [35.8%])。 WT染色涂片上的有机体在少数情况下表现出更好的形态(67例中有4例[6%]),而在三种情况下,有机体数量不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号