首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network
【2h】

Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network

机译:国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络选择药物滥用障碍诊断工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Several instruments for diagnosing substance use disorders (SUD) have been developed, but to date none has emerged as the standard for community-based clinical studies. To select the most suitable SUD diagnostic instrument for its clinical trials, the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) implemented a procedure in which 36 university-based addiction researchers and 62 community-based addiction treatment providers evaluated and ranked five widely recognized diagnostic instruments: (1) the SUD section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID); (2) the SUD section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, 2nd ed. (CIDI-2); (3) the SUD section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV Diagnosis (DIS-IV); (4) the Diagnostic Statistical Manual-IV Checklist (DSM-IV Checklist); and (5) the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS). To assist the evaluation and ranking process, key characteristics of each instrument were presented in tabular and narrative formats. Participants ranked each instrument from 1 (most preferred) to 5 (least preferred). The SCID received the best overall mean score (2.24) followed by the CIDI-2 (2.59), DIS (2.94), DSM Checklist (3.40) and the SDSS (3.83). After discussing the pragmatic and scientific advantages and disadvantages of each instrument, the CTN Steering Committee selected the CIDI-2. The selection of the CIDI-2 standardizes the collection of diagnostic data and provides a common diagnostic tool for practitioners and clinical researchers in the CTN. Implications for practice/research collaboration and initiatives are explored.
机译:已经开发了几种用于诊断物质使用失调(SUD)的仪器,但是迄今为止,还没有一种仪器成为基于社区的临床研究的标准。为了选择最适合其临床试验的SUD诊断工具,美国国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络(CTN)实施了一项程序,其中36名以大学为基础的成瘾研究人员和62名以社区为基础的成瘾治疗提供者进行了评估,并对五种公认的诊断方法进行了排名手段:(1)DSM-IV(SCID)的结构化临床访谈的SUD部分; (2)综合国际诊断访谈的SUD部分,第二版。 (CIDI-2); (3)DSM-IV诊断诊断面试时间表(DIS-IV)的SUD部分; (4)《诊断统计手册-IV检查表》(DSM-IV检查表); (5)物质依赖严重程度量表(SDSS)。为了帮助评估和排名过程,以表格和叙述形式介绍了每种工具的关键特征。参与者将每种乐器从1(最喜欢)到5(最不喜欢)进行排名。 SCID的总体平均得分最高(2.24),其次是CIDI-2(2.59),DIS(2.94),DSM清单(3.40)和SDSS(3.83)。在讨论了每种工具的实用和科学的优缺点之后,CTN指导委员会选择了CIDI-2。 CIDI-2的选择标准化了诊断数据的收集,并为CTN中的从业者和临床研究人员提供了通用的诊断工具。探索了对实践/研究合作和倡议的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号