首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Immune Responses to Adenovirus and Adeno-Associated Vectors Used for Gene Therapy of Brain Diseases: The Role of Immunological Synapses in Understanding the Cell Biology of Neuroimmune Interactions
【2h】

Immune Responses to Adenovirus and Adeno-Associated Vectors Used for Gene Therapy of Brain Diseases: The Role of Immunological Synapses in Understanding the Cell Biology of Neuroimmune Interactions

机译:对用于脑疾病基因治疗的腺病毒和腺相关载体的免疫应答:免疫突触在理解神经免疫相互作用的细胞生物学中的作用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Researchers have conducted numerous pre-clinical and clinical gene transfer studies using recombinant viral vectors derived from a wide range of pathogenic viruses such as adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, and lentivirus. As viral vectors are derived from pathogenic viruses, they have an inherent ability to induce a vector specific immune response when used in vivo. The role of the immune response against the viral vector has been implicated in the inconsistent and unpredictable translation of pre-clinical success into therapeutic efficacy in human clinical trials using gene therapy to treat neurological disorders. Herein we thoroughly examine the effects of the innate and adaptive immune responses on therapeutic gene expression mediated by adenoviral, AAV, and lentiviral vectors systems in both pre-clinical and clinical experiments. Furthermore, the immune responses against gene therapy vectors and the resulting loss of therapeutic gene expression are examined in the context of the architecture and neuroanatomy of the brain immune system. The chapter closes with a discussion of the relationship between the elimination of transgene expression and the in vivo immunological synapses between immune cells and target virally infected brain cells. Importantly, although systemic immune responses against viral vectors injected systemically has thought to be deleterious in a number of trials, results from brain gene therapy clinical trials do not support this general conclusion suggesting brain gene therapy may be safer from an immunological standpoint.“The world does not speak. Only we do.” Richard Rorty, Contingency, irony, and solidarity, 1989.
机译:研究人员已使用衍生自多种病原性病毒(如腺病毒,腺相关病毒和慢病毒)的重组病毒载体进行了许多临床前和临床基因转移研究。由于病毒载体源自病原性病毒,因此在体内使用时,它们具有诱导载体特异性免疫反应的固有能力。在使用基因疗法治疗神经系统疾病的人类临床试验中,临床前成功转化为治疗效力的前后不一致和不可预测的关系涉及针对病毒载体的免疫应答的作用。在本文中,我们在临床前和临床实验中彻底检查了先天性和适应性免疫应答对腺病毒,AAV和慢病毒载体系统介导的治疗性基因表达的影响。此外,在脑免疫系统的结构和神经解剖学的背景下检查了针对基因治疗载体的免疫应答以及由此导致的治疗基因表达的丧失。本章以讨论转基因表达的消除与免疫细胞与目标病毒感染的脑细胞之间的体内免疫突触之间的关系作为结束。重要的是,尽管在许多试验中,针对全身注射的病毒载体的全身免疫应答被认为是有害的,但脑基因治疗临床试验的结果并不支持这一一般性结论,表明从免疫学角度来看脑基因治疗可能更安全。不说话。只有我们这样做。”理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty),《或有事,讽刺与团结》,1989年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号