首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Blinded comparison of a direct immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody staining method and a Giemsa staining method for identification of Pneumocystis carinii in induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
【2h】

Blinded comparison of a direct immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody staining method and a Giemsa staining method for identification of Pneumocystis carinii in induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

机译:直接免疫荧光单克隆抗体染色方法和Giemsa染色方法的盲目比较用于鉴定感染了人类免疫缺陷病毒的患者的痰液和支气管肺泡灌洗标本中的卡氏肺孢子虫。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A new direct immunofluorescence monoclonal antibody (DFA) method (Genetic Systems, Inc., Seattle, Wash.) for identification of Pneumocystis carinii in induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens was compared in a blinded study with an established Giemsa stain method. We evaluated 148 consecutive clinical specimens from 104 patients with the following results. For the 67 patients (64%) infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 49 were initially negative by both the DFA and the Giemsa methods, none were negative by DFA and positive by Giemsa, 6 were positive by DFA and negative by Giemsa, and 12 were positive by both methods, for a sensitivity and a negative predictive value of greater than 99%. For the six patients positive by DFA and negative by Giemsa, all were positive by both methods on evaluation of subsequently obtained clinical specimens, suggesting a specificity of greater than 99% and a false-positive rate of less than 1%. For 37 patients whose HIV status was negative or unknown, 35 were negative by both methods and 2 were positive by DFA and negative by Giemsa. The DFA method was simple to perform and required less time for scoring of stained slides than the Giemsa method, but care had to be taken to avoid false-positive readings due to extraneous fluorescence. This study indicates that the DFA method represents an advance as a sensitive, simple, and rapid way to identify P. carinii in induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from HIV-infected patients and suggests greater sensitivity of the DFA than the Giemsa method in this patient population.
机译:在一项盲目的研究中,将一种新的直接免疫荧光单克隆抗体(DFA)方法(Genetic Systems,Inc.,西雅图,华盛顿)鉴定为诱导痰和支气管肺泡灌洗标本中的卡氏肺孢子虫,并与已建立的吉姆萨染色法进行了比较。我们评估了104位患者的148个连续临床标本,得出以下结果。对于67例感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的患者(64%),DFA和Giemsa方法最初均阴性49例,DFA阴性且Giemsa阳性均无,DFA阳性6例,Giemsa阴性,这两种方法的阳性率均为12,阳性率和阴性预测值均大于99%。对于DFA阳性和Giemsa阴性的6例患者,两种方法对随后获得的临床标本进行评估均均为阳性,表明特异性大于99%,假阳性率小于1%。对于37例HIV阴性或未知的患者,两种方法均阴性35例,DFA阳性2例,Giemsa阴性。与Giemsa方法相比,DFA方法操作简便,对染色载玻片进行评分所需的时间更少,但是必须注意避免由于外部荧光而产生假阳性读数。这项研究表明,DFA方法代表了一种灵敏,简单且快速的方法,可用于从HIV感染患者的痰液和支气管肺泡灌洗标本中鉴定Carinii假单胞菌,并且该患者的DFA敏感性比Giemsa方法高。人口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号