首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Computer-assisted self-interviews: A cost effectiveness analysis
【2h】

Computer-assisted self-interviews: A cost effectiveness analysis

机译:计算机辅助自我访谈:成本效益分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) questionnaires are being used with increased frequency to deliver surveys that previously were administered via self-administered paper-and-pencil questionnaires (SAQs). Although CASI may offer a number of advantages, an important consideration for researchers is the assessment modality's immediate and long-term costs. To facilitate researchers' choice between CASI and SAQ, this article provides theoretical cost models with specific parameters for comparing the costs for each assessment type. Utilizing these cost models, this study compared the cost effectiveness in a health behavior study in which both CASI (n = 100) and SAQ (n = 100) questionnaires were administered. Given the high initial costs, CASI was found to be less cost effective than SAQ for a single study. However, for studies with large sample sizes or when CASI software is to be used for multiple studies, CASI would be more cost effective and should be the assessment mode of choice.
机译:计算机辅助自我访谈(CASI)问卷正在越来越频繁地用于提供以前通过自我管理的纸质铅笔问卷(SAQs)进行的调查。尽管CASI可能具有许多优势,但对于研究人员而言,重要的考虑因素是评估方式的近期和长期成本。为了方便研究人员在CASI和SAQ之间进行选择,本文提供了具有特定参数的理论成本模型,用于比较每种评估类型的成本。利用这些成本模型,本研究在一项健康行为研究中比较了成本效益,在该行为中,同时进行了CASI(n = 100)和SAQ(n = 100)问卷调查。鉴于较高的初始成本,对于单个研究而言,发现CASI的成本效益不如SAQ。但是,对于样本量较大的研究或将CASI软件用于多个研究时,CASI更具成本效益,应成为评估的首选方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号