首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Radial Maze Analog for Pigeons: Evidence for Flexible Coding Strategies May Result from Faulty Assumptions
【2h】

Radial Maze Analog for Pigeons: Evidence for Flexible Coding Strategies May Result from Faulty Assumptions

机译:鸽子的径向迷宫模拟:错误的假设可能导致灵活编码策略的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research with the radial maze has found evidence that rats can remember both places that they have already been (retrospective coding) and places they have yet to visit (prospective coding; ). Such dual coding also has been found in pigeons using a radial maze analog in which insertion of a delay at different points during a trial affects performance differentially depending on where in the trial it is inserted. When a delay is interpolated either early or late in a trial, there is minimal disruption of performance compared with when it is interpolated in the middle of the trial. However, the analysis required with this procedure requires the assumption that if errors made on control trials are subtracted from errors made in delay trials, the remaining errors can be directly attributed to the delay. But errors may also be attributed to the changing criterion for making a response as the trial proceeds. Furthermore, the animal’s tendency to choose alternatives in a systematic order may also affect its need to remember the sequence of choices made (and yet to be made) on each trial. In the present research, we avoided having to make this assumption by giving the pigeons a two-alternative choice at the time of testing and by randomly determining for the pigeon the order of predelay choices on each trial. This change in procedure resulted in comparable performance as a function of where in the trial the test occurred on both control and delay trials. The effect of the delay was to produce a general decrement in performance independent of where it occurred in the trial.
机译:先前关于放射状迷宫的研究发现了证据,老鼠可以记住已经去过的地方(追溯性编码)和尚未去过的地方(追溯性编码)。在使用径向迷宫类似物的鸽子中也发现了这种双重编码,其中在试验过程中在不同点插入延迟会影响性能,具体取决于在试验中插入的位置。当在试验的早期或晚期插入延迟时,与在试验的中间插入延迟相比,对性能的影响最小。但是,此过程所需的分析要求假设,如果从延误试验中的错误中减去对照试验中的错误,则其余错误可直接归因于延误。但是,随着审判的进行,错误也可能归因于不断变化的标准,以便做出回应。此外,动物倾向于按系统的顺序选择替代品,也可能会影响其记住每次试验中做出(但尚未做出)选择顺序的需要。在本研究中,我们避免了必须通过在测试时为鸽子提供两种选择以及在每次试验中为鸽子随机确定预延迟选择的顺序来做出这一假设。程序的这种改变导致了可比较的性能,这是对照试验和延迟试验中试验在何处进行的函数。延误的结果是使绩效总体下降,而与试验发生的地点无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号