首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data
【2h】

Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data

机译:图形显示血糖监测系统准确性数据的新方法的优缺点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Graphical presentation of blood glucose monitoring systems’ (BGMSs) accuracy typically includes difference plots (DPs). Recently, 3 new approaches were presented: radar plots (RPs), rectangle target plots (RTPs), and surveillance error grids (SEGs). BGMS data were modeled based on 3 scenarios that can be encountered in real life to highlight strengths and limitations of these approaches. Detailed assessment of BGMS data may be easier in plots with individual data points (DPs, RPs, SEGs), whereas RTPs may facilitate display of large amounts of data or comparison of BGMS. SEGs have the advantage of assessing clinical risk. The selection of a specific type depends mostly on the kind of information sought (eg, accuracy in specific concentration intervals, lot-to-lot variability, clinical risk) as there is no “absolute best” approach.
机译:血糖监测系统(BGMS)准确性的图形表示通常包括差异图(DP)。最近,提出了3种新方法:雷达图(RP),矩形目标图(RTP)和监视误差网格(SEG)。 BGMS数据是根据现实生活中可能遇到的3种情况建模的,以突出这些方法的优势和局限性。在具有单个数据点(DP,RP,SEG)的图中,对BGMS数据的详细评估可能会更容易,而RTP可能有助于显示大量数据或比较BGMS。 SEG具有评估临床风险的优势。特定类型的选择主要取决于所需信息的种类(例如,特定浓度区间的准确性,批次间的变异性,临床风险),因为没有“绝对最佳”的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号