首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Effect of Pioglitazone and Ramipril on Biomarkers of Low-Grade Inflammation and Vascular Function in Nondiabetic Patients with Increased Cardiovascular Risk and an Activated Inflammation: Results from the PIOace Study
【2h】

Effect of Pioglitazone and Ramipril on Biomarkers of Low-Grade Inflammation and Vascular Function in Nondiabetic Patients with Increased Cardiovascular Risk and an Activated Inflammation: Results from the PIOace Study

机译:吡格列酮和雷米普利对心血管风险增加和炎症激活的非糖尿病患者低度炎症和血管功能生物标志物的影响:PIOace研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AimsThis study investigated the effects of pioglitazone (PIO), ramipril (RAM), or their combination (PIRA) on low-grade inflammation in nondiabetic hypertensive patients with increased cardiovascular risk.Methods and ResultsPatients enrolled in this placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel trial (72 male, 77 female, aged 60 ± 9 years, body mass index 30.4 ± 4.7 kg/m2, duration of hypertension 9 ± 8 years) were treated with either 30/45 mg PIO (dose titration), 2.5/5 mg RAM, or their combination for 12 weeks. A reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed with PIO (−0.89 ± 1.98 mg/liter; -25%) and PIRA (−0.49 ± 2.11 mg/liter; -16%), while an increase was seen with RAM (0.58 ± 2.13 mg/liter; +20%, p < .05 vs PIO and PIRA). The 24-hour blood pressure profile showed a small increase with both monotherapies but a decrease with PIRA (p < .05 vs PIO). Improvements in biomarkers of chronic systemic inflammation and insulin resistance (IR) were observed in the PIO and PIRA arms only [PIO/RAM/PIRA: homeostasis model of assessment of IR: -0.78 ± 1.39 (−29%)/0.15 ± 1.03 (+5%)/ -1.44 ± 2.83 (−40%); adiponectin: 8.51 ± 5.91 (+104%)/ 0.09 ± 2.63 (+1%)/ 8.86 ± 6.37 mg/liter (+107%); matrix metallo-proteinase-9: -48 ± 127 (−12%)/-1 ± 224 (0%)/-60 ± 210 ng/ml (−13%), p < .05 for RAM vs PIO or PIRA in all cases].
机译:目的本研究调查了吡格列酮(PIO),雷米普利(RAM)或它们的组合(PIRA)对心血管风险增加的非糖尿病高血压患者的轻度炎症的影响。方法和结果随机,平行试验(72例男性,77例女性,年龄60±9岁,体重指数30.4±4.7 kg / m 2 ,高血压病程9±8年)采用30/45治疗mg PIO(剂量滴定),2.5 / 5 mg RAM或它们的组合治疗12周。 PIO(-0.89±1.98 mg / l; -25%)和PIRA(-0.49±2.11 mg / l; -16%)观察到高敏感性C反应蛋白减少,而RAM则增加(0.58±2.13毫克/升; + 20%,相对于PIO和PIRA,p <.05)。两种单一疗法的24小时血压曲线均显示出小幅上升,而PIRA则下降(p <.05 vs PIO)。仅在PIO和PIRA组中观察到了慢性全身炎症和胰岛素抵抗(IR)的生物标志物的改善[PIO / RAM / PIRA:IR稳态评估模型:-0.78±1.39(-29%)/ 0.15±1.03( +5%)/ -1.44±2.83(−40%);脂联素:8.51±5.91(+104%)/ 0.09±2.63(+1%)/ 8.86±6.37 mg /升(+ 107%);基质金属蛋白酶9:-48±127(−12%)/-1±224(0%)/-60±210 ng / ml(−13%),对于RAM vs PIO或PIRA,p <0.05所有情况]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号