首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >An Analysis: To Code or Not to Code—That Is the Question
【2h】

An Analysis: To Code or Not to Code—That Is the Question

机译:分析:要编码还是不编码—这就是问题所在

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most blood glucose monitoring systems need coding to correct for variation in lots of enzyme, which leads to differences in lots of strips. About 16% of patients miscode the meters, although the magnitude of the miscoding is unstudied. This miscoding has the potential to cause errors as high as 30% and to cause errors in adjusting insulin therapy that could lead to hypoglycemia at least 10% of the time. Studies of these systems suggest that they have accuracy similar to other current meters and have similar physical characteristics. Because they do not require coding, they are often easier to use. No-coding systems have the potential to avoid some errors in blood glucose.
机译:大多数血糖监测系统都需要进行编码以校正大量酶的变化,从而导致许多条带的差异。尽管尚未研究误码的幅度,但大约有16%的患者对电表进行了误码。这种错误编码有可能导致高达30%的错误,并可能导致调整胰岛素治疗的错误,至少在10%的时间内可能导致低血糖。对这些系统的研究表明,它们具有与其他电流表相似的精度,并且具有相似的物理特性。因为它们不需要编码,所以它们通常更易于使用。无编码系统具有避免血糖错误的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号