A randomized controlled crossover study to discern the value of 360-degree versus traditional faculty-only evaluation for performance improvement of anesthesiology residents.

摘要

BACKGROUND360-degree evaluation, or multi-rater feedback, is a means of providing evaluation from a variety of stakeholders. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) lists 360-degree feedback as a recommended method for evaluating residents. Our study determines if 360-degree evaluation, as compared to traditional evaluation, affords anesthesiology residents greater potential for performance improvement.