首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of the Prognostic and Predictive Utilities of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Adjuvant! for Women with Node-Negative ER-Positive Breast Cancer: Results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20
【2h】

Comparison of the Prognostic and Predictive Utilities of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Adjuvant! for Women with Node-Negative ER-Positive Breast Cancer: Results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20

机译:21-基因复发得分测定和佐剂预测和预测实用性的比较!对于节点阴性ER阳性乳腺癌的女性:NSABP B-14和NSABP B-20的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® (RS) is a validated genomic predictor of outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant! was developed using SEER registry data and results from the Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists’ overview analyses to estimate outcome and benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. In this report we compare the prognostic and predictive utility of these two tools in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer. RS and Adjuvant! results were available from 668 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-14 patients: 227 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-20 patients, and 424 chemotherapy-plus-tamoxifen-treated B-20 patients. Adjuvant! results were also available from 1952 B-20 patients. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the prognostic and predictive utility of RS and Adjuvant!. Both RS (p<0.001) and Adjuvant! (p=0.002) provided strong independent prognostic information in tamoxifen-treated patients. Combining RS and individual clinicopathologic characteristics provided greater prognostic discrimination than combining RS and the composite Adjuvant!. In the B-20 cohort with RS results (n=651), RS was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit (interaction p=0.031 for DRFI, p=0.011 for overall survival [OS], p=0.082 for disease-free survival [DFS]), but Adjuvant! was not (interaction p=0.99, p=0.311 and p=0.357, respectively). However, in the larger B-20 sub-cohort (n=1952), Adjuvant! was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit for OS (interaction p=0.009) but not for DRFI (p=0.219) or DFS (p=0.099). Prognostic estimates can be optimized by combining RS and clinicopathologic information instead of simply combining RS and Adjuvant!. RS should be used for estimating relative chemotherapy benefit.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号