首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Digital Imaging >Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System—a Design Thinking-Based Approach
【2h】

Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System—a Design Thinking-Based Approach

机译:基于放射科医生参考医师双向反馈系统的放射报告价值评估:一种基于设计思维的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the era of value-based healthcare, many aspects of medical care are being measured and assessed to improve quality and reduce costs. Radiology adds enormously to health care costs and is under pressure to adopt a more efficient system that incorporates essential metrics to assess its value and impact on outcomes. Most current systems tie radiologists’ incentives and evaluations to RVU-based productivity metrics and peer-review-based quality metrics. In a new potential model, a radiologist’s performance will have to increasingly depend on a number of parameters that define “value,” beginning with peer review metrics that include referrer satisfaction and feedback from radiologists to the referring physician that evaluates the potency and validity of clinical information provided for a given study. These new dimensions of value measurement will directly impact the cascade of further medical management. We share our continued experience with this project that had two components: RESP (Referrer Evaluation System Pilot) and FRACI (Feedback from Radiologist Addressing Confounding Issues), which were introduced to the clinical radiology workflow in order to capture referrer-based and radiologist-based feedback on radiology reporting. We also share our insight into the principles of design thinking as applied in its planning and execution.
机译:在基于价值的医疗保健时代,正在对医疗保健的许多方面进行评估和评估,以提高质量并降低成本。放射学极大地增加了医疗保健成本,并且面临采用更高效的系统的压力,该系统应结合必要的指标来评估其价值和对结果的影响。当前大多数系统将放射科医生的激励和评估与基于RVU的生产率指标和基于同行评审的质量指标联系在一起。在新的潜在模型中,放射科医生的表现将越来越依赖于定义“价值”的许多参数,首先要从同行评议指标开始,这些指标包括推荐人的满意程度以及放射科医生对推荐医师的反馈,以评估临床的效力和有效性。为特定研究提供的信息。价值测量的这些新维度将直接影响进一步医疗管理的级联。我们分享这个项目的持续经验,该项目包括两个部分:RESP(推荐人评估系统试验员)和FRACI(放射科医生解决混杂问题的反馈),将其引入临床放射学工作流程中,以捕获基于推荐人和放射科医生的情况关于放射学报告的反馈。我们还分享了对在设计和执行中应用的设计思维原理的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号