首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Dental Biomechanics >Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth
【2h】

Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth

机译:牙釉质和牙本质的力学性能和作用的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The mechanical properties of enamel and dentin were studied using test specimens having the same shape and dimensions because these properties might vary with the experimental conditions and specimen shapes and dimensions. Healthy human teeth were used as specimens for mechanical tests. The stress (MPa), strain (%), and elastic modulus (E, MPa) of the specimens were obtained from compression tests. The maximum stresses of the enamel, dentin, and enamel–dentin specimens were 62.2 ± 23.8, 193.7 ± 30.6, and 126.1 ± 54.6 MPa, respectively. The maximum strains of the enamel, dentin, and enamel–dentin specimens were 4.5 ± 0.8%, 11.9 ± 0.1%, and 8.7 ± 2.7%, respectively. The elastic moduli of the enamel, dentin, and enamel–dentin specimens were 1338.2 ± 307.9, 1653.7 ± 277.9, and 1628.6 ± 482.7 MPa, respectively. The measured hardness value of enamel specimens (HV = 274.8 ± 18.1) was around 4.2 times higher than that of dentin specimens (HV = 65.6 ± 3.9). Judging from the measured values of the stress and strain of enamel specimens, enamel tended to fracture earlier than dentin; therefore, it was considered more brittle than dentin. However, judging from the measured hardness values, enamel was considered harder than dentin. Therefore, enamel has higher wear resistance, making it suitable for grinding and crushing foods, and dentin has higher force resistance, making it suitable for absorbing bite forces. The different mechanical roles of enamel and dentin may arise from their different compositions and internal structures, as revealed through scanning electron micrographs of enamel and dentin.
机译:使用具有相同形状和尺寸的试样研究牙釉质和牙本质的机械性能,因为这些性能可能随实验条件以及试样形状和尺寸而变化。健康的人类牙齿被用作机械测试的样本。通过压缩试验获得样品的应力(MPa),应变(%)和弹性模量(E,MPa)。牙釉质,牙本质和牙釉质-牙本质样品的最大应力分别为62.2±23.8、193.7±30.6和126.1±54.6 MPa。牙釉质,牙本质和牙釉质-牙本质标本的最大应变分别为4.5±0.8%,11.9±0.1%和8.7±2.7%。牙釉质,牙本质和牙釉质-牙本质标本的弹性模量分别为1338.2±307.9、1653.7±277.9和1628.6±482.7 MPa。牙釉质样品(HV = 274.8±18.1)的硬度值约为牙本质样品(HV = 65.6±3.9)的4.2倍。从牙釉质样品的应力和应变的测量值来看,牙釉质比牙本质更容易断裂。因此,它被认为比牙本质更脆。但是,从测得的硬度值来看,牙釉质被认为比牙本质更坚硬。因此,搪瓷具有较高的耐磨性,使其适合于研磨和粉碎食品,而牙本质具有较高的抗力性,使其适合吸收咬合力。牙釉质和牙本质的不同机械作用可能源于牙釉质和牙本质的扫描电子显微照片,它们的成分和内部结构不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号