首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Harmonizing Databases? Using a Quasi-Experimental Design to Evaluate a Public Mental Health Re-entry Program
【2h】

Harmonizing Databases? Using a Quasi-Experimental Design to Evaluate a Public Mental Health Re-entry Program

机译:协调数据库?使用准实验设计来评估公共心理健康重新进入计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Our study is the first-ever initiative to merge administrative databases in Massachusetts to evaluate an important public mental health program. It examines post-incarceration outcomes of adults with serious mental illness (SMI) enrolled in the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH) Forensic Transition Team (FTT) program. The program began in 1998 with the goal of transitioning offenders with SMI released from state and local correctional facilities utilizing a core set of transition activities. In this study we evaluate the program’s effectiveness using merged administrative data from various state agencies for the years 2007 – 2011, comparing FTT clients to released prisoners who, despite having serious mental health disorders, did not meet the criterion for DMH services. By systematically describing our original study design and the barriers we encountered, this report will inform future efforts to evaluate public programs using merged administrative databases and electronic health records.
机译:我们的研究是第一次合并马萨诸塞州的行政数据库的倡议,以评估重要的公共心理健康计划。它探讨了在马萨诸塞州心理健康部(DMH)法医过渡团队(FTT)方案中的严重精神疾病(SMI)的患有严重精神疾病的后陈腐该计划于1998年始于将违法者转换从国家和地方惩教设施发布的SMI,利用核心过渡活动。在这项研究中,我们使用2007 - 2011年各国各国代理商的合并行政数据评估了该计划的有效性,比较FTT客户在发布囚犯,尽管有严重的心理健康障碍,但没有达到DMH服务的标准。通过系统地描述我们的原始学习设计和我们遇到的障碍,本报告将以经济的行政数据库和电子健康记录为未来努力提供评估公共计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号