首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Community Health Workers Support Community-based Participatory Research Ethics:
【2h】

Community Health Workers Support Community-based Participatory Research Ethics:

机译:社区卫生工作者支持社区的参与研究道德:

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ethical principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR)— specifically, community engagement, mutual learning, action-reflection, and commitment to sustainability—stem from the work of Kurt Lewin and Paulo Freire. These are particularly relevant in cancer disparities research because vulnerable populations are often construed to be powerless, supposedly benefiting from programs over which they have no control. The long history of exploiting minority individuals and communities for research purposes (the U.S. Public Health Service Tuskegee Syphilis Study being the most notorious) has left a legacy of mistrust of research and researchers. The purpose of this article is to examine experiences and lessons learned from community health workers (CHWs) in the 10-year translation of an educational intervention in the research-to-practice-to-community continuum. We conclude that the central role played by CHWs enabled the community to gain some degree of control over the intervention and its delivery, thus operationalizing the ethical principles of CBPR.
机译:基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)的道德原则,即社区参与,相互学习,行动反思和对可持续性的承诺,源于Kurt Lewin和Paulo Freire的工作。这些在癌症差异研究中尤其重要,因为脆弱的人群通常被认为是无能为力的,据说他们受益于他们无法控制的项目。为研究目的而剥削少数群体和社区的悠久历史(最臭名昭著的是美国公共卫生服务塔斯基吉梅毒研究)留下了对研究人员和研究人员不信任的遗产。本文的目的是研究从研究到实践到社区的连续性教育干预措施的十年翻译中从社区卫生工作者(CHW)那里获得的经验教训。我们得出的结论是,社区卫生工作者发挥的核心作用使社区能够对干预措施及其实施获得一定程度的控制,从而实施了《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》的道德原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号