首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effects of Ultraviolet-B Irradiance on Intraspecific Competition and Facilitation of Plants: Self-Thinning Size Inequality and Phenotypic Plasticity
【2h】

Effects of Ultraviolet-B Irradiance on Intraspecific Competition and Facilitation of Plants: Self-Thinning Size Inequality and Phenotypic Plasticity

机译:自疏大小不均与可塑性:在种内竞争和促进植物的紫外B辐射的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

(1) The effects of facilitation on the structure and dynamics of plant populations have not been studied so widely as competition. The UV-B radiation, as a typical environmental factor causing stress, may result in direct stress and facilitation. (2) The effects of UV-B radiation on intraspecific competition and facilitation were investigated based on the following three predictions on self-thinning, size inequality, and phenotypic plasticity: i) Self-thinning is the reduction in density that results from the increase in the mean biomass of individuals in crowded populations, and is driven by competition. In this study, the mortality rate of the population is predicted to decrease from UV-B irradiance. ii) The size inequality of a population increases with competition intensity because larger individuals receive a disproportionate share of resources, thereby leaving limited resources for smaller individuals. The second hypothesis assumes that direct stress decreases the size inequality of the population. iii) Phenotypic plasticity is the ability to alter one’s morphology in response to environmental changes. The third hypothesis assumes that certain morphological indices can change among the trade-offs between competition, facilitation, and stress. These predictions were tested by conducting a field pot experiment using mung beans, and were supported by the following results: (3) UV-B radiation increased the survival rate of the population at the end of self-thinning. However, this result was mainly due to direct stress rather than facilitation. (4) Just as competitor, facilitation was also asymmetric. It increased the size inequality of populations during self-thinning, whereas stress decreased the size inequality. (5) Direct stress and facilitation influence plants differently on various scales. Stress inhibited plant growth, whereas facilitation showed the opposite on an individual scale. Stress increased survival rate, whereas facilitation increased individual variability on the population scale. (6) Trade-offs between competitions, facilitation, and direct stress varied in different growing stages.
机译:(1)促进对植物种群结构和动态的影响尚未像竞争那样广泛地研究。作为引起压力的典型环境因素,UV-B辐射可能会导致直接的压力和促进作用。 (2)基于以下三个关于自我变薄,尺寸不平等和表型可塑性的预测,研究了UV-B辐射对种内竞争和促进的影响:i)自变薄是密度增加导致的密度降低在拥挤的人口中,个体的平均生物量受竞争的驱动。在这项研究中,预计人口的死亡率会因UV-B辐射而降低。 ii)人口规模不平等随着竞争激烈程度的增加而增加,因为较大的个人获得不成比例的资源份额,从而为较小的个人留下有限的资源。第二个假设假设直接压力减少了人口的规模不平等。 iii)表型可塑性是指响应环境变化而改变其形态的能力。第三个假设假设某些形态学指标可以在竞争,促进和压力之间的权衡之间变化。这些预测通过使用绿豆进行的田间试验进行了测试,并得到以下结果的支持:(3)UV-B辐射在自我变薄结束时提高了种群的存活率。但是,这个结果主要是由于直接的压力而不是促进。 (4)就像竞争对手一样,便利化也不对称。它在自我瘦化过程中增加了人口规模不平等,而压力则减轻了人口规模不平等。 (5)直接胁迫和促进对植物的影响程度不同。胁迫抑制了植物的生长,而促进在个体范围上却显示出相反的结果。压力增加了存活率,而便利化增加了人口规模上的个体变异性。 (6)竞争,便利化和直接压力之间的权衡在不同的成长阶段有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号