首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Sulindac Sulfide Inhibits Sarcoendoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ ATPase Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response and Exerts Toxicity in Glioma Cells: Relevant Similarities To and Important Differences From Celecoxib
【2h】

Sulindac Sulfide Inhibits Sarcoendoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ ATPase Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response and Exerts Toxicity in Glioma Cells: Relevant Similarities To and Important Differences From Celecoxib

机译:苏林加硫化物抑制SarcoEndothtquic网+ ATP酶诱导内质网应力反应并对胶质瘤细胞产生毒性:与Celecoxib的相关相似性和重要差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Malignant gliomas have low survival expectations regardless of current treatments. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prevent cell transformation and slow cancer cell growth by mechanisms independent of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition. Certain NSAIDs trigger the endoplasmic reticulum stress response (ERSR), as revealed by upregulation of molecular chaperones such as GRP78 and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP). Although celecoxib (CELE) inhibits the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA), an effect known to induce ERSR, sulindac sulfide (SS) has not been reported to affect SERCA. Here, we investigated these two drugs for their effects on Ca2+ homeostasis, ERSR, and glioma cell survival. Our findings indicate that SS is a reversible inhibitor of SERCA and that both SS and CELE bind SERCA at its cyclopiazonic acid binding site. Furthermore, CELE releases additional Ca2+ from the mitochondria. In glioma cells, both NSAIDS upregulate GRP78 and activate ER-associated caspase-4 and caspase-3. Although only CELE upregulates the expression of CHOP, it appears that CHOP induction could be associated with mitochondrial poisoning. In addition, CHOP induction appears to be uncorrelated with the gliotoxicity of these NSAIDS in our experiments. Our data suggest that activation of ERSR is primarily responsible for the gliotoxic effect of these NSAIDS. Because SS has good brain bioavailability, has lower COX-2 inhibition, and has no mitochondrial effects, it represents a more appealing molecular candidate than CELE to achieve gliotoxicity via activation of ERSR.
机译:无论采用何种治疗方法,恶性神经胶质瘤的生存期均较低。非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)通过独立于环氧合酶(COX)抑制的机制阻止细胞转化并减缓癌细胞的生长。某些NSAID会触发内质网应激反应(ERSR),如分子伴侣蛋白如GRP78和C / EBP同源蛋白(CHOP)的上调所揭示。尽管塞来昔布(CELE)抑制肌内质网Ca 2 + ATPase(SERCA),但已知可诱导ERSR的作用,但尚未报道舒林酸硫化物(SS)会影响SERCA。在这里,我们研究了这两种药物对Ca 2 + 体内稳态,ERSR和神经胶质瘤细胞存活的影响。我们的发现表明SS是SERCA的可逆抑制剂,并且SS和CELE都在其环吡唑酸结合位点结合SERCA。此外,CELE从线粒体中释放出额外的Ca 2 + 。在神经胶质瘤细胞中,NSAIDS均上调GRP78并激活与ER相关的caspase-4和caspase-3。尽管只有CELE上调CHOP的表达,但看来CHOP的诱导可能与线粒体中毒有关。此外,在我们的实验中,CHOP诱导似乎与这些NSAIDS的神经胶质毒性无关。我们的数据表明,ERSR的激活主要负责这些NSAIDS的神经胶质作用。由于SS具有良好的大脑生物利用度,具有较低的COX-2抑制作用,并且不具有线粒体作用,因此它比CELE更具吸引力,可以通过激活ERSR实现神经胶质毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号