首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Are Coastal Protected Areas Always Effective in Achieving Population Recovery for Nesting Sea Turtles?
【2h】

Are Coastal Protected Areas Always Effective in Achieving Population Recovery for Nesting Sea Turtles?

机译:沿海保护区对巢海龟的种群恢复是否总是有效?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sea turtles are highly migratory and usually dispersed, but aggregate off beaches during the nesting season, rendering them vulnerable to coastal threats. Consequently, coastal Marine Protection Areas (MPAs) have been used to facilitate the recovery of turtle populations, but the effectiveness of these programs is uncertain as most have been operating for less than a single turtle generation (or<20 yr). South Africa, however, hosts one of the longest running conservation programs, protecting nesting loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) turtles since 1963 in a series of coastal MPAs. This provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the long-term effect of spatial protection on the abundance of two highly migratory turtle species with different life history characteristics. Population responses were assessed by modeling the number of nests over time in an index area (13 km) and an expanded monitoring area (53 km) with varying survey effort. Loggerhead abundance increased dramatically from∼250 to>1700 nests pa (index area) especially over the last decade, while leatherback abundance increased initially∼10 to 70 nests pa (index area), but then stabilized. Although leatherbacks have higher reproductive output per female and comparable remigration periods and hatching success to loggerheads, the leatherback population failed to expand. Our results suggest that coastal MPAs can work but do not guarantee the recovery of sea turtle populations as pressures change over time. Causes considered for the lack of population growth include factors in the MPA (expansion into unmonitored areas or incubation environment) of outside of the MPA (including carrying capacity and fishing mortality). Conservation areas for migratory species thus require careful design to account for species-specific needs, and need to be monitored to keep track of changing pressures.
机译:海龟高度迁徙,通常散居,但在筑巢季节在海​​滩上聚集,使其容易受到沿海威胁。因此,沿海海洋保护区(MPA)已被用于促进海龟种群的恢复,但是这些计划的有效性尚不确定,因为大多数海龟保护区的运作时间不到一个海龟代(或<20年)。然而,南非拥有一项运行时间最长的保护计划之一,自1963年以来就在一系列沿海MPA中保护巢(Caretta caretta)和棱皮海龟(Dermochelys coriacea)。这提供了一个独特的机会来评估空间保护对两种具有不同生活史特征的高度迁徙乌龟种类的丰富度的长期影响。通过对索引区域(13 km)和扩展的监视区域(53 km)中随时间变化的巢数进行建模,以不同的调查工作量来评估种群响应。的丰度从每年约250巢增加到> 1700个巢(索引区域),特别是在最近十年中,而棱皮背的丰度最初从每年约10巢增加到70个巢(索引区域),但随后稳定了下来。尽管棱皮龟的人均生殖产量更高,并且有相当的迁徙期,并且孵化成功率达到了鱼,但是棱皮龟的数量却没有增加。我们的结果表明,沿海地区MPA可以发挥作用,但不能保证随着压力的变化海龟种群的恢复。考虑到人口缺乏增长的原因包括MPA之外MPA(扩展到不受监视的区域或孵化环境)的因素(包括承载能力和捕鱼死亡率)。因此,用于迁徙物种的保护区需要仔细设计以解决特定物种的需求,并且需要对其进行监控以跟踪变化的压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号