首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Mu-opioidergic modulation differs in deep and superficial wide-dynamic range dorsal horn neurons in mice
【2h】

Mu-opioidergic modulation differs in deep and superficial wide-dynamic range dorsal horn neurons in mice

机译:Mu-opioidergic调制在小鼠深和浅的宽动态范围背角神经元中有所不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The spinal cord dorsal horn is an important action site for morphine analgesia. Wide-dynamic range (WDR) neurons in the dorsal horn are essential to spinal pain transmission and show increased excitability after repetitive noxious drive (windup). In light of differences in mu-opioid receptor distribution and neurophysiological properties of WDR neurons between deep and superficial dorsal horn, we recorded extracellular single-unit activity of WDR neurons from deep (350–700 μm) and superficial (<350 μm) dorsal horn in C57BL/6 mice and compared their responses to spinal superfusion of morphine (0.5 mM, 30 μl) and naloxone (1 mM, 30 μl). The windup level to repetitive electrical stimulation of 1.0 Hz (16 pulses, suprathreshold for C-fiber activation, 2.0 ms) was significantly decreased by morphine in deep (n=8), but not superficial (n=11), WDR neurons. However, the steady C-component response to graded intra-cutaneous electrical stimuli (0.01–5.0 mA, 2 ms) was significantly depressed by morphine only in superficial neurons. In separate experiments, spinal administration of naloxone facilitated the development of windup to 0.2 Hz stimulation in deep (n=10), but not superficial (n=8), WDR neurons. Accordingly, morphine and naloxone modulation of neuronal activity may be related to a specific effect on neuronal sensitization/plasticity in deep WDR neurons, whereas morphine inhibition may depress acute noxious inputs to superficial WDR neurons. Our study suggests that mu-opioidergic modulation may be different in deep and superficial WDR neurons.
机译:脊髓背角是吗啡镇痛的重要作用部位。背角中的宽动态范围(WDR)神经元对于脊柱疼痛的传递至关重要,并且在重复性有害驱动作用(缠绕)后显示出更高的兴奋性。考虑到深和浅背背角之间的W型神经元的mu阿片样受体分布和神经生理特性的差异,我们记录了深背(350-700μm)和浅背(<350μm)背角中WDR神经元的细胞外单单位活性在C57BL / 6小鼠中比较了它们对吗啡(0.5 mM,30μl)和纳洛酮(1 mM,30μl)脊柱灌注的反应。吗啡在深部(n = 8)而非浅表(n = 11)WDR神经元中,以1.0 Hz(16脉冲,C纤维激活的阈值上限,持续时间为2.0毫秒)重复电刺激的结束水平明显降低。但是,仅在浅表神经元中,吗啡显着抑制了对分级的皮内电刺激(0.01–5.0 mA,2 ms)的稳定C成分反应。在单独的实验中,纳洛酮的脊柱给药促进了WDR神经元深层(n = 10)而非浅表(n = 8)神经元发展为0.2 Hz刺激。因此,吗啡和纳洛酮对神经元活性的调节可能与对深层WDR神经元的神经元敏化/可塑性的特定作用有关,而吗啡抑制作用可能会抑制对浅层WDR神经元的急性有害输入。我们的研究表明,在深层和浅层的WDR神经元中,μ视蛋白调节可能不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号