首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Because Muncies Densities Are Not Manhattans: Using Geographical Weighting in the EM Algorithm for Areal Interpolation
【2h】

Because Muncies Densities Are Not Manhattans: Using Geographical Weighting in the EM Algorithm for Areal Interpolation

机译:由于Muncie的密度不是Manhattan的密度:在EM算法中使用地理加权进行区域插值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Areal interpolation transforms data for a variable of interest from a set of source zones to estimate the same variable's distribution over a set of target zones. One common practice has been to guide interpolation by using ancillary control zones that are related to the variable of interest's spatial distribution. This guidance typically involves using source zone data to estimate the density of the variable of interest within each control zone. This article introduces a novel approach to density estimation, the geographically weighted expectation-maximization (GWEM) algorithm, which combines features of two previously used techniques, the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and geographically weighted regression. The EM algorithm provides a framework for incorporating proper constraints on data distributions, and using geographical weighting allows estimated control-zone density ratios to vary spatially. We assess the accuracy of GWEM by applying it with land-use/land-cover ancillary data to population counts from a nationwide sample of 1980 United States census tract pairs. We find that GWEM generally is more accurate in this setting than several previously studied methods. Because target-density weighting (TDW)—using 1970 tract densities to guide interpolation—outperforms GWEM in many cases, we also consider two GWEM-TDW hybrid approaches, and find them to improve estimates substantially.
机译:区域插值转换来自一组源区域的目标变量的数据,以估计同一变量在一组目标区域上的分布。一种常见的做法是通过使用与目标变量的空间分布有关的辅助控制区域来指导插值。该指南通常涉及使用源区域数据来估计每个控制区域内目标变量的密度。本文介绍了一种密度估计的新方法,即地理加权期望最大化(GWEM)算法,该算法结合了两种先前使用的技术的特征:期望最大化(EM)算法和地理加权回归。 EM算法提供了一个框架,用于合并对数据分布的适当约束,并且使用地理加权可以使估计的控制区域密度比在空间上变化。我们通过将GWEM与土地利用/土地覆盖辅助数据一起应用到1980年美国人口普查对全国样本中的人口计数中,来评估GWEM的准确性。我们发现,在这种情况下,GWEM通常比以前研究的几种方法更准确。由于目标密度加权(TDW)(在1970年使用区域密度指导插值)在许多情况下优于GWEM,因此我们还考虑了两种GWEM-TDW混合方法,并发现它们可以显着改善估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号