首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Leisure economy and colonial urbanism: Darjeeling 1835–1930
【2h】

Leisure economy and colonial urbanism: Darjeeling 1835–1930

机译:休闲经济和殖民地城市主义:大吉岭1835年至1930年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article posits that the hill station of Darjeeling was a unique form of colonial urbanism. It shifts historiographical interest from major urban centres in colonial India (such as Bombay or Calcutta) and instead attempts a greater understanding of smaller urban centres. In the process, it also interrogates the category of hill stations, which have been understood as exotic and scenic sites rather than as towns that were integral to the colonial economy. In arguing that hill stations, particularly Darjeeling, were not merely the scenic and healthy ‘other’ of the clamorous, dirty and diseased plains of India, it refutes suggestions that the ‘despoiling’ or overcrowding of Darjeeling was incremental to the purposes of its establishment. Instead, it suggests that Darjeeling was part of the colonial mainstream; its urbanization and inclusion into the greater colonial economy was effected from the time of its establishment. Therefore, a constant tension between its exotic and its functional elements persisted throughout.
机译:本文认为,大吉岭的山岗站是殖民城市主义的一种独特形式。它把历史学的兴趣从印度殖民地的主要城市中心(如孟买或加尔各答)转移了出来,而是试图对较小的城市中心有更多的了解。在此过程中,它还询问了山岗站的类别,这些山岗站被理解为异国风光和风景名胜,而不是殖民地经济不可或缺的城镇。在论证山站,尤其是大吉岭,不仅是印度喧闹,肮脏和患病的平原上风景秀丽且健康的“其他”,它驳斥了大吉岭的“贬低”或拥挤对于其建立的目的是渐进的建议。相反,这表明大吉岭是殖民主流的一部分。从建立之日起就开始实行城市化,并纳入更大的殖民地经济。因此,它的外来元素和功能元素之间始终保持着持续的张力。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    NANDINI BHATTACHARYA;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(40),3
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 442–461
  • 总页数 16
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号