首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Attitudes towards Doping and Related Experience in Spanish National Cycling Teams According to Different Olympic Disciplines
【2h】

Attitudes towards Doping and Related Experience in Spanish National Cycling Teams According to Different Olympic Disciplines

机译:根据不同的奥林匹克学科对西班牙国家自行车队的兴奋剂态度及相关经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Attitudes towards doping are considered an influence of doping intentions. The aims of the present study were 1) to discover and compare the attitudes towards doping among Spanish national team cyclists from different Olympic disciplines, as well as 2) to get some complementary information that could better explain the context. The sample was comprised of seventy-two cyclists: mean age 19.67±4.72 years; 70.8% males (n = 51); from the different Olympic disciplines of Mountain bike -MTB- (n = 18), Bicycle Moto Cross -BMX- (n = 12), Track -TRA- (n = 9) and Road -ROA- (n = 33). Descriptive design was carried out using a validated scale (PEAS). To complement this, a qualitative open-ended questionnaire was used. Overall mean score (17–102) was 36.12±9.39. For different groups, the data were: MTB: 30.28±6.92; BMX: 42.46±10.74; TRA: 43.22±12.00; ROA: 34.91±6.62, respectively. In relation to overall score, significant differences were observed between MTB and BMX (p = 0.002) and between MTB and TRA (p = 0.003). For the open-ended qualitative questionnaire, the most mentioned word associated with “doping” was “cheating” (48.83% of total sample), with “responsible agents of doping” the word “doctor” (52,77%), and with the “main reason for the initiation in doping” the words “sport achievement” (45.83%). The major proposed solution was “doing more doping controls” (43.05%). Moreover, 48.67% stated that there was “a different treatment between cycling and other sports”. This study shows that Spanish national team cyclists from Olympic cycling disciplines, in general, are not tolerant in relation to doping. BMX and Track riders are a little more permissive towards the use of banned substances than MTB and Road. Results from the qualitative open-ended questionnaire showed interesting data in specific questions. These results empower the idea that, apart from maintaining doping controls and making them more efficient, anti-doping education programs are needed from the earliest ages.
机译:对掺杂的态度被认为是掺杂意图的影响。本研究的目的是1)发现并比较来自不同奥林匹克学科的西班牙国家队自行车手对兴奋剂的态度,以及2)获得一些补充信息,以更好地解释情况。样本由72名自行车手组成:平均年龄19.67±4.72岁;男性70.8%(n = 51);来自不同的奥运学科:山地自行车-MTB-(n = 18),自行车越野摩托车-BMX-(n = 12),田径运动-TRA-(n = 9)和道路-ROA-(n = 33)。使用有效量表(PEAS)进行描述性设计。为了补充这一点,使用了定性的开放式问卷。总体平均得分(17-102)为36.12±9.39。对于不同的组,数据为:MTB:30.28±6.92;小轮车:42.46±10.74; TRA:43.22±12.00; ROA:分别为34.91±6.62。关于总分,在MTB和BMX之间(p = 0.002)以及MTB和TRA之间(p = 0.003)观察到显着差异。对于不限成员名额的定性调查问卷,与“兴奋剂”相关的提及最多的词是“作弊”(占样本总数的48.83%),与“负责任的兴奋剂”相关的词是“医生”(52.77%),以及“开始使用兴奋剂的主要原因”一词是“体育成就”(45.83%)。提出的主要解决方案是“进行更多的掺杂控制”(43.05%)。此外,48.67%表示“在骑自行车和其他运动之间有不同的待遇”。这项研究表明,一般来说,来自奥林匹克自行车运动学科的西班牙国家队自行车手对兴奋剂不宽容。与山地车和公路车相比,小轮车和田径车手在使用违禁药物方面更宽容。定性开放性问卷的结果显示了特定问题中有趣的数据。这些结果使人们认为,除了保持兴奋剂控制并使之更加有效之外,从最早的时代就需要反兴奋剂教育计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号