首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Ph+ ALL patients in first complete remission have similar survival after reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic transplantation: Impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and minimal residual disease
【2h】

Ph+ ALL patients in first complete remission have similar survival after reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic transplantation: Impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and minimal residual disease

机译:首次完全缓解的Ph + ALL患者在强度降低和异基因同种异体移植后存活率相似:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的影响和残留病的发生率极低

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We analyzed 197 adults with Ph+ ALL in first complete remission; 67 patients receiving RIC were matched with 130 receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for age, donor type, and HCT year. Over 75% received pre-HCT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mostly imatinib; 39% (RIC) and 49% (MAC) were MRDneg pre-HCT. At a median 4.5 years follow-up, 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was lower in RIC (13%) than MAC (36%;p=0.001) while the 3-year relapse rate was 49% in RIC and 28% in MAC (p=0.058). Overall survival was similar (RIC 39% [95% CI:27–52] vs. 35% [95% CI:270–44];p=0.62). Patients MRDpos pre-HCT had higher risk of relapse with RIC versus MAC (HR 1.97;p=0.026). However, patients receiving pre-HCT TKI in combination with MRD negativity pre-RIC HCT had superior OS (55%) compared to a similar MRDneg population after MAC (33%; p=0.0042). In multivariate analysis, RIC lowered TRM (HR 0.6; p=0.057), but absence of pre-HCT TKI (HR 1.88;p=0.018), RIC (HR 1.891;p=0.054) and pre-HCT MRDpos (HR 1.6; p=0.070) increased relapse risk. RIC is a valid alternative strategy for Ph+ ALL patients ineligible for MAC and MRDneg status is preferred pre-HCT.
机译:降低强度调节(RIC)的同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)对于Ph +急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的疗效尚不确定。我们分析了197名首次完全缓解的成人,其中Ph + ALL。 67例接受RIC的患者与130例接受了年龄,供体类型和HCT年的清髓治疗(MAC)的患者相匹配。超过75%的患者接受了HCT前的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI),其中大部分为伊马替尼。 HCT前的MRD neg 分别为39%(RIC)和49%(MAC)。在中位4.5年的随访中,RIC的1年移植相关死亡率(TRM)(13%)低于MAC(36%; p = 0.001),而RIC的3年复发率为49%。 MAC占28%(p = 0.058)。总体生存率相似(RIC 39%[95%CI:27-52]与35%[95%CI:270-44]; p = 0.62)。 HRIC之前的MRD pos 患者RIC相对于MAC的复发风险更高(HR 1.97; p = 0.026)。然而,与MAC后相似的MRD neg 人群相比,接受HCT之前的TKI合并MRD阴性的RIC HCT的患者的OS(55%)更高(33%; p = 0.0042)。在多变量分析中,RIC降低了TRM(HR 0.6; p = 0.057),但没有HCT之前的TKI(HR 1.88; p = 0.018),RIC(HR 1.891; p = 0.054)和HCT之前的MRD pos (HR 1.6; p = 0.070)增加了复发风险。 RIC是对所有不适合MAC且+ MRD neg 状态的Ph + ALL患者的有效替代策略,首选HCT之前。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号