首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >β-Diversity of Functional Groups of Woody Plants in a Tropical Dry Forest in Yucatan
【2h】

β-Diversity of Functional Groups of Woody Plants in a Tropical Dry Forest in Yucatan

机译:犹加敦热带干旱森林木本植物官能团的β-多样性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two main theories have attempted to explain variation in plant species composition (β-diversity). Niche theory proposes that most of the variation is related to environment (environmental filtering), whereas neutral theory posits that dispersal limitation is the main driver of β-diversity. In this study, we first explored how α- and β-diversity of plant functional groups defined by growth form (trees, shrubs and lianas, which represent different strategies of resource partitioning), and dispersal syndrome (autochory, anemochory and zoochory, which represent differences in dispersal limitation) vary with successional age and topographic position in a tropical dry forest. Second, we examined the effects of environmental, spatial, and spatially-structured environmental factors on β-diversity of functional groups; we used the spatial structure of sampling sites as a proxy for dispersal limitation, and elevation, soil properties and forest stand age as indicators of environmental filtering. We recorded 200 species and 22,245 individuals in 276 plots; 120 species were trees, 41 shrubs and 39 lianas. We found that β-diversity was highest for shrubs, intermediate for lianas and lowest for trees, and was slightly higher for zoochorous than for autochorous and anemochorous species. All three dispersal syndromes, trees and shrubs varied in composition among vegetation classes (successional age and topographic position), whilst lianas did not. β-diversity was influenced mostly by proxies of environmental filtering, except for shrubs, for which the influence of dispersal limitation was more important. Stand age and topography significantly influenced α-diversity across functional groups, but showed a low influence on β-diversity –possibly due to the counterbalancing effect of resprouting on plant distribution and composition. Our results show that considering different plant functional groups reveals important differences in both α- and β-diversity patterns and correlates that are not apparent when focusing on overall woody plant diversity, and that have important implications for ecological theory and biodiversity conservation.
机译:两种主要理论试图解释植物物种组成的变异(β-多样性)。生态位理论认为,大多数变化与环境(环境过滤)有关,而中性理论则认为,色散限制是β多样性的主要驱动力。在这项研究中,我们首先探讨了植物功能群的α-和β多样性如何由生长形式(树木,灌木和藤本植物,代表不同的资源分配策略)和分散综合症(自噬,厌食和动物繁殖)定义。在热带干旱森林中,扩散限制的差异会因演替年龄和地形位置而异。其次,我们研究了环境,空间和空间结构化环境因素对官能团β多样性的影响。我们使用采样点的空间结构作为扩散限制的代表,海拔,土壤性质和林分年龄作为环境过滤的指标。我们在276个样地中记录了200种和22,245个个体; 120种是树木,41种灌木和39种藤本植物。我们发现,灌木的β多样性最高,藤本植物为中等,树木最低,而自生和自养物种的β多样性略高。在植被类别(演替年龄和地形位置)中,所有三种传播综合症,树木和灌木的成分均不同,而藤本植物则没有。除灌木外,β多样性主要受环境过滤代理的影响,在灌木中,分布限制的影响更为重要。林分年龄和地势显着影响各个功能组之间的α多样性,但对β多样性的影响较小-可能是由于发芽对植物分布和组成的平衡作用。我们的结果表明,考虑不同的植物功能组会揭示出α-和β-多样性模式的重要差异,并且在侧重于整体木本植物多样性时这些关联并不明显,这对生态学理论和生物多样性保护具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号