首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Meta-Analysis With Complex Research Designs: Dealing With Dependence From Multiple Measures and Multiple Group Comparisons
【2h】

Meta-Analysis With Complex Research Designs: Dealing With Dependence From Multiple Measures and Multiple Group Comparisons

机译:具有复杂研究设计的元分析:处理来自多个度量和多个组比较的依赖性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research has shown that treating dependent effect sizes as independent inflates the variance of the mean effect size and introduces bias by giving studies with more effect sizes more weight in the meta-analysis. This article summarizes the different approaches to handling dependence that have been advocated by methodologists, some of which are more feasible to implement with education research studies than others. A case study using effect sizes from a recent meta-analysis of reading interventions is presented to compare the results obtained from different approaches to dealing with dependence. Overall, mean effect sizes and variance estimates were found to be similar, but estimates of indexes of heterogeneity varied. Meta-analysts are advised to explore the effect of the method of handling dependence on the heterogeneity estimates before conducting moderator analyses and to choose the approach to dependence that is best suited to their research question and their data set.
机译:先前的研究表明,将独立效应量视为独立效应会扩大平均效应量的方差,并通过在荟萃分析中为具有更大效应量的研究赋予更大的权重而引入偏差。本文总结了方法学家提倡的处理依赖的不同方法,其中一些方法比其他方法更适合用于教育研究。提出了一个案例研究,该案例使用了来自近期阅读干预措施的荟萃分析中的效应量,以比较从不同方法处理依赖性所获得的结果。总体而言,发现平均效应大小和方差估计相似,但异质性指标的估计却有所不同。建议元分析人员在进行主持人分析之前,先探讨处理异质性估计量依赖性的方法的效果,并选择最适合其研究问题和数据集的依赖性方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号