首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Adoption of Evidence-Based Clinical Innovations: The Case of Buprenorphine Use by Opioid Treatment Programs
【2h】

Adoption of Evidence-Based Clinical Innovations: The Case of Buprenorphine Use by Opioid Treatment Programs

机译:采用循证临床创新:阿片类药物治疗方案使用丁丙诺啡的案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article examines changes from 2005 to 2011 in the use of an evidence-based clinical innovation, buprenorphine use, among a nationally representative sample of opioid treatment programs and identifies characteristics associated with its adoption. We apply a model of the adoption of clinical innovations that focuses on the work needs and characteristics of staff; organizations’ technical and social support for the innovation; local market dynamics and competition; and state policies governing the innovation. Results indicate that buprenorphine use increased 24% for detoxification and 47% for maintenance therapy between 2005 and 2011. Buprenorphine use was positively related to reliance on private insurance and availability of state subsidies to cover its cost and inversely related to the percentage of clients who injected opiates, county size, and local availability of methadone. The results indicate that financial incentives and market factors play important roles in opioid treatment programs’ decisions to adopt evidence-based clinical innovations such as buprenorphine use.
机译:本文研究了全国代表性的阿片类药物治疗方案样本中,基于证据的临床创新(丁丙诺啡的使用)从2005年到2011年的变化,并确定了与采用阿片类药物有关的特征。我们采用一种采用临床创新的模型,该模型重点关注员工的工作需求和特点;组织对创新的技术和社会支持;当地市场动态和竞争;以及管理创新的国家政策。结果表明,在2005年至2011年之间,丁丙诺啡的使用增加了24%的排毒和47%的维持治疗。丁丙诺啡的使用与对私人保险的依赖和国家补贴的可负担性成正比,与注射用药的客户比例成反比阿片类药物,县规模和美沙酮的当地供应量。结果表明,经济诱因和市场因素在阿片类药物治疗方案采用基于证据的临床创新(例如丁丙诺啡使用)的决策中起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号