首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): A Pragmatic Trial of Complex Treatment for a Complex Disorder

【2h】

Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): A Pragmatic Trial of Complex Treatment for a Complex Disorder

机译：双相情感障碍比较有效性的临床健康成果计划（Bipolar CHOICE）：对复杂疾病进行复杂治疗的务实试验

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundClassic and second generation antipsychotic mood stabilizers are recommended for treatment of bipolar disorder, yet there are no randomized comparative effectiveness studies that have examined the “real-world” advantages and disadvantages of these medications

机译：背景技术推荐使用经典和第二代抗精神病情绪稳定剂治疗躁郁症，但尚无随机的比较有效性研究来检查这些药物的“现实世界”利弊

著录项

期刊名称 other
作者
Andrew A. Nierenberg; Louisa G. Sylvia; Andrew C. Leon; Noreen Reilly-Harrington; Leah W. Shesler; Susan L. McElroy; Edward S. Friedman; Michael E. Thase; Richard C. Shelton; Charles Bowden; Mauricio Tohen; Vivek Singh; Thilo Deckersbach; Terence Ketter; James Kocsis; Melvin G. McInnis; David Schoenfeld; William V. Bobo; Joseph R. Calabrese;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 -1(11),1
年度 -1
页码 114–127
总页数 20
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
bipolar disorder quetiapine lithium comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial;

机译：躁郁症;喹硫平;锂;比较疗效;随机临床试验;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Clinical and health outcomes initiative in comparative effectiveness for bipolar disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): A pragmatic trial of complex treatment for a complex disorder [J] . NierenbergA.A., SylviaL.G., LeonA.C., Clinical trials: journal of the Society for Clinical Trials . 2014,第1期

机译：双相情感障碍的相对有效性的临床和健康结果倡议（Bipolar CHOICE）：对复杂疾病进行复杂治疗的实用试验
2. Bipolar CHOICE (Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness): A Pragmatic 6-Month Trial of Lithium Versus Quetiapine for Bipolar Disorder [J] . Andrew A. Nierenberg, Charles L. Bowden, Edward S. Friedman, Primary care companion to the journal of clinical psychiatry . 2016,第1期

机译：双相选择（比较有效性的临床健康成果计划）：针对双相性精神障碍的锂与奎硫平的6个月实用试验
3. Bipolar CHOICE (Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness): A Pragmatic 6-Month Trial of Lithium Versus Quetiapine for Bipolar Disorder [J] . Nierenberg Andrew A., McElroy Susan L., Friedman Edward S., The journal of clinical psychiatry . 2016,第1期

机译：双相选择（比较有效性的临床健康成果计划）：针对双相性精神障碍的锂与奎硫平的6个月实用试验
4. Designing Mobile Health Technology for Bipolar Disorder: A Field Trial of the MONARCA System [C] . Jakob E. Bardram, Mads Frost, Karoly Szanto, Annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 2013

机译：设计用于双相情感障碍的移动医疗技术：MONARCA系统的现场试验
5. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Infliximab on General Cognition in a Population of Depressed Individuals with Bipolar Disorder Type I/II [D] . Pan, Zihang. 2018

机译：一项随机，双盲，安慰剂对照的临床试验，评估英夫利昔单抗对I / II型双相情感障碍抑郁症患者总体认知的影响
6. Effect of adjunctive benzodiazepines on clinical outcomes in lithium- or quetiapine-treated outpatients with bipolar I or II disorder: Results from the Bipolar CHOICE trial [O] . William V. Bobo, Noreen A. Reilly-Harrington, Terence A. Ketter, -1

机译：辅助苯二氮卓类药物对锂或喹硫平治疗的双相I或II型门诊患者的临床结局的影响：双相CHOICE试验的结果
7. Medical burden in bipolar disorder: findings from the Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder study (Bipolar CHOICE) [O] . Sylvia Louisa G, Shelton Richard C, Kemp David E, 2015

机译：双相情感障碍的医疗负担：双相障碍研究中比较有效性的临床和健康结果倡议的结果（双极选择）

Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): A Pragmatic Trial of Complex Treatment for a Complex Disorder

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅