首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Aquatic Ecosystem Response to Timber Harvesting for the Purpose of Restoring Aspen
【2h】

Aquatic Ecosystem Response to Timber Harvesting for the Purpose of Restoring Aspen

机译:水生生态系统对木材恢复的反应以恢复白杨

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The removal of conifers through commercial timber harvesting has been successful in restoring aspen, however many aspen stands are located near streams, and there are concerns about potential aquatic ecosystem impairment. We examined the effects of management-scale conifer removal from aspen stands located adjacent to streams on water quality, solar radiation, canopy cover, temperature, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and soil moisture. This 8-year study (2003–2010) involved two projects located in Lassen National Forest. The Pine-Bogard Project consisted of three treatments adjacent to Pine and Bogard Creeks: (i) Phase 1 in January 2004, (ii) Phase 2 in August 2005, and (iii) Phase 3 in January 2008. The Bailey Project consisted of one treatment adjacent to Bailey Creek in September 2006. Treatments involved whole tree removal using track-laying harvesters and rubber tire skidders. More than 80% of all samples analyzed for NO3-N, NH4-N, and PO4-P at Pine, Bogard, and Bailey Creeks were below the detection limit, with the exception of naturally elevated PO4-P in Bogard Creek. All nutrient concentrations (NO3-N, NH4-N, PO4-P, K, and SO4-S) showed little variation within streams and across years. Turbidity and TSS exhibited annual variation, but there was no significant increase in the difference between upstream and downstream turbidity and TSS levels. There was a significant decrease in stream canopy cover and increase in the potential fraction of solar radiation reaching the streams in response to the Pine-Bogard Phase 3 and Bailey treatments; however, there was no corresponding increase in stream temperatures. Macroinvertebrate metrics indicated healthy aquatic ecosystem conditions throughout the course of the study. Lastly, the removal of vegetation significantly increased soil moisture in treated stands relative to untreated stands. These results indicate that, with careful planning and implementation of site-specific best management practices, conifer removal to restore aspen stands can be conducted without degrading aquatic ecosystems.
机译:通过商业木材采伐去除针叶树已经成功地恢复了白杨,但是许多白杨林位于溪流附近,并且人们担心潜在的水生生态系统受损。我们研究了从溪流旁的白杨林中去除管理规模的针叶树对水质,太阳辐射,树冠覆盖,温度,水生大型无脊椎动物和土壤水分的影响。这项为期8年的研究(2003年至2010年)涉及位于拉森国家森林的两个项目。 Pine-Bogard项目由与Pine和Bogard Creeks相邻的三种处理组成:(i)2004年1月的第一阶段,(ii)2005年8月的第二阶段,以及(iii)2008年1月的第三阶段。Bailey项目包括一个在2006年9月与Bailey Creek相邻的水处理。处理包括使用履带式收割机和橡胶轮胎打滑机整棵树。在Pine,Bogard和Bailey Creeks分析的所有NO3-N,NH4-N和PO4-P样品中,超过80%的样品均低于检测极限,但Bogard Creek的PO4-P自然升高。所有养分浓度(NO3-N,NH4-N,PO4-P,K和SO4-S)在溪流内和多年内均显示出很小的变化。浊度和TSS呈年度变化,但上,下游浊度和TSS水平之间的差异没有显着增加。响应于Pine-Bogard阶段3和Bailey处理,河流冠层的覆盖量显着减少,到达河流的太阳辐射的潜在比例增加;但是,溪流温度没有相应增加。整个研究过程中,大型无脊椎动物指标表明健康的水生生态系统状况。最后,相对于未处理的林分,去除植被可显着增加处理后的林分的土壤水分。这些结果表明,通过精心规划和实施针对特定地点的最佳管理实践,可以在不破坏水生生态系统的情况下进行针叶树去除以恢复白杨林。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号