首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Changes in Chemical Permeation of Disposable Latex Nitrile and Vinyl GlovesExposed to Simulated Movement
【2h】

Changes in Chemical Permeation of Disposable Latex Nitrile and Vinyl GlovesExposed to Simulated Movement

机译:一次性乳胶腈和乙烯基手套的化学渗透性变化暴露于模拟运动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Glove movement can affect chemical permeation of organic compounds through polymer glove products. However, conflicting reports make it difficult to compare the effects of movement on chemical permeation through commonly available glove types. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of movement on chemical permeation of an organic solvent through disposable latex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves. Simulated whole-glove permeation testing was conducted using ethyl alcohol and a previously designed permeation test system. With exposure to movement, a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.001) in breakthrough time was observed for the latex (-23%) and nitrile gloves (-31%). With exposure to movement, only the nitrile glove exhibited a significant increase (p ≤ 0.001) in steady-state permeation rate (+47%) and cumulative permeation at 30 min (+111%). Even though the nitrile glove provided optimum chemical resistance against ethyl alcohol, it was most affected by movement. With exposure to movement, the latex glove was an equivalent option for overall worker protection, because it was less affected by movement and the permeation rate was lower than that of the nitrile glove. In contrast, the vinyl glove was the least affected by movement, but did not provide adequate chemical resistance to ethyl alcohol in comparison with the nitrile and latex gloves. In conclusion, gloveselection should take movement and polymer type into account. Some glove polymer types areless affected by movement, most notably the latex glove in this test. With nitrile gloves,at least a factor of three should be used when attempting to assign a protection factorwhen repetitive hand motions are anticipated. Ultimately, the latex gloves outperformednitrile and vinyl in these tests, which evaluated the effect of movement on chemicalpermeation. Future research should aim to resolve some of the observed discrepancies intest results with latex and vinyl gloves.
机译:手套的运动会影响有机化合物通过聚合物手套产品的化学渗透。但是,相互矛盾的报道使得很难通过常见的手套类型来比较运动对化学渗透的影响。这项研究旨在评估运动对通过一次性乳胶,腈和乙烯基手套的有机溶剂化学渗透的影响。使用乙醇和预先设计的渗透测试系统进行了模拟的全手套渗透测试。随着运动的进行,乳胶(-23%)和丁腈手套(-31%)的穿透时间显着减少(p≤0.001)。接触运动后,只有丁腈手套的稳态渗透率(+ 47%)和30分钟的累积渗透率(+ 111%)显着增加(p≤0.001)。即使丁腈手套提供了最佳的耐乙醇化学腐蚀性,但它受运动的影响最大。暴露于运动中后,乳胶手套是整体工人防护的同等选择,因为它受运动的影响较小,并且渗透率低于丁腈手套。相反,乙烯基手套受运动的影响最小,但与丁腈和乳胶手套相比,它对乙醇的耐化学性不足。总之,手套选择时应考虑运动和聚合物类型。一些手套聚合物类型是受运动影响较小,在此测试中最明显的是乳胶手套。戴上丁腈手套尝试分配保护因子时,至少应使用三个因子当预期重复的动作时。最终,乳胶手套表现出众这些测试中的丁腈和乙烯基,评估了运动对化学物质的影响渗透。未来的研究应着眼于解决一些观察到的差异。乳胶和乙烯基手套的测试结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号