首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Analysis of 7-Membered Lactones by Computational NMR Methods. Proton NMR Chemical Shift Data are More Discriminating than Carbon
【2h】

Analysis of 7-Membered Lactones by Computational NMR Methods. Proton NMR Chemical Shift Data are More Discriminating than Carbon

机译:通过计算NMR方法分析7元内酯。质子NMR化学位移数据比碳更具区分性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report an NMR chemical shift study of conformationally challenging seven-membered lactones (>1–>11); computed and experimental data sets are compared. The computations involved full conformational analysis of each lactone, Boltzmann-weighted averaging of the chemical shifts across all conformers, and linear correction of the computed chemical shifts. DFT geometry optimizations [M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p)] and GIAO NMR chemical shift calculations [B3LYP/6-311+G(2d,p)] provide the computed chemical shifts. The corrected-mean absolute error (CMAE), the average of the differences between the computed and experimental chemical shifts for each of the eleven lactones, is encouragingly small (0.02–0.08 ppm for 1H or 0.8–2.2 ppm for 13C). Three pairs of cis vs. trans diastereomeric lactones were used to assess the ability of the method to distinguish between stereoisomers. The experimental shifts were compared with the computed shifts for each of the two possible isomers. We introduce the use of a “match ratio”—the ratio of the larger (worse fit) to the smaller (better fit) CMAE. A greater match ratio value indicates better distinguishing ability. The match ratios are larger for proton data [2.4–4.0 (ave = 3.2)] than for carbon [1.1–2.3 (ave = 1.6)], indicating that the former provide a better basis for discriminating these diastereomers.
机译:我们报告了构象具有挑战性的七元内酯(> 1 – > 11 )的NMR化学位移研究;计算和实验数据集进行比较。计算包括每个内酯的完全构象分析,所有构象异构体上化学位移的玻尔兹曼加权平均,以及计算出的化学位移的线性校正。 DFT几何优化[M06-2X / 6-31 + G(d,p)]和GIAO NMR化学位移计算[B3LYP / 6-311 + G(2d,p)]提供了计算的化学位移。校正平均绝对误差(CMAE),即11种内酯的计算值与实验值之间的平均化学位移的平均值,令人鼓舞地很小( 1 H值为0.02–0.08 ppm或0.8– 13 C为2.2 ppm)。使用三对顺式对反式非对映体内酯来评估该方法区分立体异构体的能力。将实验位移与两种可能异构体各自的计算位移进行了比较。我们介绍了“匹配比率”的使用-较大(较差拟合)与较小(较合适)CMAE的比率。匹配率值越大表示区分能力越好。质子数据的匹配率[2.4–4.0(ave = 3.2)]比碳的匹配率[1.1–2.3(ave = 1.6)]大,这表明前者为区分这些非对映异构体提供了更好的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号