首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >When We Should Worry More: Using Cognitive Bias Modification to Drive Adaptive Health Behaviour
【2h】

When We Should Worry More: Using Cognitive Bias Modification to Drive Adaptive Health Behaviour

机译:什么时候我们应该更担心:使用认知偏差修正来驱动适应性健康行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A lack of behavioural engagement in health promotion or disease prevention is a problem across many health domains. In these cases where people face a genuine danger, a reduced focus on threat and low levels of anxiety or worry are maladaptive in terms of promoting protection or prevention behaviour. Therefore, it is possible that increasing the processing of threat will increase worry and thereby enhance engagement in adaptive behaviour. Laboratory studies have shown that cognitive bias modification (CBM) can increase or decrease anxiety and worry when increased versus decreased processing of threat is encouraged. In the current study, CBM for interpretation (CBM-I) is used to target engagement in sun protection behaviour. The goal was to investigate whether inducing a negative rather than a positive interpretation bias for physical threat information can enhance worry elicited when viewing a health campaign video (warning against melanoma skin cancer), and consequently lead to more adaptive behaviour (sun protection). Participants were successfully trained to either adopt a positive or negative interpretation bias using physical threat scenarios. However, contrary to expectations results showed that participants in the positive training condition reported higher levels of worry elicited by the melanoma video than participants in the negative training condition. Video elicited worry was, however, positively correlated with a measure of engagement in sun protection behaviour, suggesting that higher levels of worry do promote adaptive behaviour. These findings imply that more research is needed to determine under which conditions increased versus decreased processing of threat can drive adaptive worry. Various potential explanations for the current findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.
机译:在许多健康领域中,缺乏促进健康或预防疾病的行为参与是一个问题。在这些人面临真正危险的情况下,减少对威胁的关注以及对焦虑或忧虑的关注程度较低,在促进保护或预防行为方面是不良的。因此,增加威胁的处理量可能会增加担忧,从而增强对自适应行为的参与度。实验室研究表明,当鼓励增加或减少威胁的处理时,认知偏差修饰(CBM)可以增加或减少焦虑和忧虑。在当前的研究中,用于解释的CBM(CBM-I)的目标是参与防晒行为。目的是调查在对健康威胁视频进行观看时(对黑素瘤皮肤癌的警告),引发对物理威胁信息的否定解释偏向而不是肯定解释偏倚是否可以增强人们的担忧,从而导致更多的适应性行为(防晒)。参加者已经成功地接受了培训,可以使用物理威胁情景采用正面或负面的解释偏见。但是,与预期相反的结果表明,积极训练条件下的参与者报告的黑色素瘤视频引发的忧虑程度高于消极训练条件下的参与者。然而,视频引发的担忧与参与防晒行为的程度呈正相关,这表明更高程度的担忧确实会促进适应性行为。这些发现意味着需要更多的研究来确定在何种情况下威胁处理的增加与减少会导致适应性担忧。讨论了对当前发现的各种潜在解释以及对未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号