首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization
【2h】

Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization

机译:将量子嵌入经典:语境化与条件化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compare two approaches to embedding joint distributions of random variables recorded under different conditions (such as spins of entangled particles for different settings) into the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory. In the contextualization approach each random variable is “automatically” labeled by all conditions under which it is recorded, and the random variables across a set of mutually exclusive conditions are probabilistically coupled (imposed a joint distribution upon). Analysis of all possible probabilistic couplings for a given set of random variables allows one to characterize various relations between their separate distributions (such as Bell-type inequalities or quantum-mechanical constraints). In the conditionalization approach one considers the conditions under which the random variables are recorded as if they were values of another random variable, so that the observed distributions are interpreted as conditional ones. This approach is uninformative with respect to relations between the distributions observed under different conditions because any set of such distributions is compatible with any distribution assigned to the conditions.
机译:我们比较了两种将不同条件下记录的随机变量的联合分布(例如纠缠粒子在不同环境下的自旋)嵌入经典Kolmogorovian概率论框架的方法。在情境化方法中,每个随机变量都在记录条件下被“自动”标记为所有条件,并且跨一组互斥条件的随机变量被概率耦合(强加了联合分布)。对于给定的一组随机变量,所有可能的概率耦合分析都可以表征它们各自的分布之间的各种关系(例如贝尔型不等式或量子力学约束)。在条件化方法中,人们认为记录随机变量的条件就好像它们是另一个随机变量的值一样,因此将观察到的分布解释为有条件的分布。对于在不同条件下观察到的分布之间的关系,此方法没有任何信息,因为这种分布的任何集合都与分配给条件的任何分布兼容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号