首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Cell Saver Use in Instrumented Posterior Correction and Fusion Surgery for Scoliosis in School-Aged Children and Adolescents
【2h】

The Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Cell Saver Use in Instrumented Posterior Correction and Fusion Surgery for Scoliosis in School-Aged Children and Adolescents

机译:在后代矫正和融合手术中对年龄较大的儿童和青少年进行脊柱侧弯的节肢手术的功效和成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery in school-aged children and adolescents is associated with the potential for massive intraoperative blood loss, which requires significant allogeneic blood transfusion. Until now, the intraoperative use of the cell saver has been extensively adopted; however, its efficacy and cost-effectiveness have not been well established. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intraoperative cell saver use. This study was a single-center, retrospective study of 247 school-aged and adolescent patients who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery between August 2007 and June 2013. A cell saver was used intraoperatively in 67 patients and was not used in 180 patients. Matched case-control pairs were selected using a propensity score to balance potential confounders in baseline characteristics. Allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) and plasma transfusions as well as blood transfusion costs were analyzed. The propensity score matching produced 60 matched pairs. Compared to the control group, the cell saver group had significantly fewer intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusions (P = 0.012). However, when the combined postoperative and total perioperative periods were evaluated for the use of allogeneic RBC transfusion, no significant differences were observed between the two groups (P = 0.813 and P = 0.101, respectively). With regard to the total cost of perioperative transfusion of all blood products (RBC and plasma), costs for the control group were slightly lower than those of the cell saver group, but this variance did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.095). The use of the cell saver in posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery in school-aged children and adolescents was able to decrease the amount of intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion but failed to decrease total perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion. Moreover, the use of the cell saver was not cost-effective.
机译:在学龄儿童和青少年中进行后路脊柱内固定和融合手术与术中大量失血的可能性有关,这需要大量的同种异体输血。迄今为止,已经广泛采用了术中使用的细胞保护剂。但是,其功效和成本效益尚未得到很好的确立。因此,本研究的目的是确定术中使用细胞保护剂的功效和成本效益。这项研究是对2007年8月至2013年6月间接受后路脊柱内固定和融合手术的247名学龄和青少年患者进行的单中心回顾性研究。67例患者在术中使用了细胞保护器,而180例患者中未使用。使用倾向评分选择匹配的病例对照对,以平衡基线特征中的潜在混杂因素。分析了同种异体红细胞(RBC)和血浆输血以及输血成本。倾向得分匹配产生了60个匹配对。与对照组相比,细胞保存组的术中异体红细胞输注明显减少(P = 0.012)。然而,当评估同种异体红细胞输注的合并术后和总围手术期时,两组之间没有观察到显着差异(分别为P = 0.813和P = 0.101)。关于所有血液制品(RBC和血浆)围手术期输血的总费用,对照组的费用略低于保存细胞组的费用,但这种差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.095)。细胞保护剂在学龄儿童和青少年的后路脊柱器械和融合手术中的使用能够减少术中同种异体红细胞的输注量,但不能减少围手术期同种异体RBC的总输注。而且,使用节电装置并不划算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号