首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Throwing out the rules: anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations
【2h】

Throwing out the rules: anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations

机译:抛弃规则:任务集重新配置期间的预期α波段振荡注意机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We assessed the role of alpha-band oscillatory activity during a task-switching design that required participants to switch between an auditory and a visual task, while task-relevant audio-visual inputs were simultaneously presented. Instructional cues informed participants which task to perform on a given trial and we assessed alpha-band power in the short 1.35-second period intervening between the cue and the task-imperative stimuli, on the premise that attentional biasing mechanisms would be deployed to resolve competition between the auditory and visual inputs. Prior work had shown that alpha-band activity was differentially deployed depending on the modality of the cued task. Here, we asked whether this activity would, in turn, be differentially deployed depending on whether participants had just made a switch of task, or were being asked to simply repeat the task. It is well-established that performance speed and accuracy are poorer on switch than on repeat trials. Here, however, the use of instructional cues completely mitigated these classic switch-costs. Measures of alpha-band synchronization/desynchronization showed that there was indeed greater and earlier differential deployment of alpha-band activity on switch versus repeat trials. Contrary to our hypothesis, this differential effect was entirely due to changes in the amount of desynchronization observed during switch and repeat trials of the visual task, with more desynchronization over both posterior and frontal scalp regions during switch-visual trials. These data imply that particularly vigorous, and essentially fully effective, anticipatory biasing mechanisms resolved the competition between competing auditory and visual inputs when a rapid switch of task was required.
机译:我们评估了任务切换设计中要求参与者在听觉任务和视觉任务之间进行切换的同时,同时显示与任务相关的视听输入的过程中,α波段振荡活动的作用。指令提示会告知参与者在给定的试验中要执行的任务,并且我们将在注意和偏见刺激之间使用1.35秒的短时间内评估提示和任务强制性刺激之间的α波段功率。在听觉和视觉输入之间。先前的工作表明,根据提示任务的方式不同地部署了alpha波段活动。在这里,我们问是否根据参与者是否刚刚完成任务转换或被要求简单地重复执行任务,而以不同的方式部署这项活动。公认的是,转换时的性能速度和准确性比重复试验差。但是,这里使用教学提示可以完全减轻这些经典的转换成本。阿尔法频段同步/去同步的测量结果表明,在开关和重复试验中,确实存在着更大,更早的阿尔法频段活动差异部署。与我们的假设相反,这种差异作用完全是由于视觉任务的切换和重复试验期间观察到的失步量变化​​所致,而在切换视觉试验期间,后头皮和额头皮区域的失步现象更多。这些数据表明,当需要快速切换任务时,特别有力且基本上完全有效的预期偏见机制可以解决竞争性听觉和视觉输入之间的竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号