首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >One Year of Preschool or Two – Is It Important for Adult Outcomes? Results from the Chicago Longitudinal Study of the Child-Parent Centers
【2h】

One Year of Preschool or Two – Is It Important for Adult Outcomes? Results from the Chicago Longitudinal Study of the Child-Parent Centers

机译:一年或两年的学前班-对成年人的结局重要吗?芝加哥儿童家长中心纵向研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Until the last year, public funding for preschool education had been growing rapidly over a decade with most state programs providing one year of preschool for four year olds. Fewer three year olds are enrolled in preschool. To investigate the importance of enrollment duration, this study is the first to estimate long-term dosage effects of years of preschool. We use data from a cohort of 1,500 students in the Chicago Longitudinal Study who enrolled in the Chicago Public Schools in the mid-1980s. Many of these students participated in a high-quality preschool program called Child-Parent Centers (CPC) for one or two years. To address selection with multiple treatments, we employ inverse propensity score weighting. Relative to children who attended one year of CPC preschool, the two-year group is significantly less likely to receive special education or be abused or neglected or to commit crimes. The findings provide support for the long-term benefits of greater exposure to preschool.
机译:直到去年,用于学龄前教育的公共资金在过去十年中一直在迅速增长,大多数州计划都为四岁的孩子提供一年的学前教育。进入学前班的三岁以下儿童更少。为了研究入学时间的重要性,这项研究是第一个评估学龄前儿童的长期剂量影响的研究。我们使用的数据来自1980年代中期在芝加哥公立学校就读的芝加哥纵向研究的1,500名学生。这些学生中有许多人参加了称为儿童家长中心(CPC)的高质量学前计划,为期一年或两年。为了解决多种处理的选择问题,我们采用了倾向得分加权。相对于上过CPC幼儿园一年的孩子,两年制的孩子受特殊教育,被虐待或被忽视或犯罪的可能性大大降低。这些发现为增加学龄前儿童的长期利益提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号