首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Habitat Availability Is a More Plausible Explanation than Insecticide Acute Toxicity for U.S. Grassland Bird Species Declines
【2h】

Habitat Availability Is a More Plausible Explanation than Insecticide Acute Toxicity for U.S. Grassland Bird Species Declines

机译:与美国草原鸟类物种杀虫剂的急性毒性下降相比栖息地可利用性更容易解释

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Grassland bird species have experienced substantial declines in North America. These declines have been largely attributed to habitat loss and degradation, especially from agricultural practices and intensification (the habitat-availability hypothesis). A recent analysis of North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) “grassland breeding” bird trends reported the surprising conclusion that insecticide acute toxicity was a better correlate of grassland bird declines in North America from 1980–2003 (the insecticide-acute-toxicity hypothesis) than was habitat loss through agricultural intensification. In this paper we reached the opposite conclusion. We used an alternative statistical approach with additional habitat covariates to analyze the same grassland bird trends over the same time frame. Grassland bird trends were positively associated with increases in area of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands and cropland used as pasture, whereas the effect of insecticide acute toxicity on bird trends was uncertain. Our models suggested that acute insecticide risk potentially has a detrimental effect on grassland bird trends, but models representing the habitat-availability hypothesis were 1.3–21.0 times better supported than models representing the insecticide-acute-toxicity hypothesis. Based on point estimates of effect sizes, CRP area and agricultural intensification had approximately 3.6 and 1.6 times more effect on grassland bird trends than lethal insecticide risk, respectively. Our findings suggest that preserving remaining grasslands is crucial to conserving grassland bird populations. The amount of grassland that has been lost in North America since 1980 is well documented, continuing, and staggering whereas insecticide use greatly declined prior to the 1990s. Grassland birds will likely benefit from the de-intensification of agricultural practices and the interspersion of pastures, Conservation Reserve Program lands, rangelands and other grassland habitats into existing agricultural landscapes.
机译:北美地区的草原鸟类数量大幅减少。这些下降主要归因于栖息地的丧失和退化,特别是由于农业实践和集约化(栖息地可利用性假设)。最近对北美繁殖鸟类调查(BBS)“草地繁殖”鸟类趋势的分析报告了令人惊讶的结论,即1980至2003年间,北美地区草地杀虫剂的急性毒性与草地鸟类数量下降的相关性更好(杀虫剂-急性-毒性假设)比农业集约化造成的生境丧失。在本文中,我们得出了相反的结论。我们使用具有其他栖息地协变量的替代统计方法来分析同一时间范围内相同的草原鸟类趋势。草原鸟类的趋势与自然保护区(CRP)土地和用作牧场的农田的增加呈正相关,而杀虫剂急性毒性对鸟类趋势的影响尚不确定。我们的模型表明,急性杀虫剂风险可能会对草地鸟类的趋势产生不利影响,但是代表栖息地-可用性假设的模型比代表杀虫剂-急性毒性假说的模型支持程度高1.3–21.0倍。根据影响大小的点估计,CRP面积和农业集约化对草原鸟类趋势的影响分别是致命杀虫剂风险的3.6倍和1.6倍。我们的发现表明,保护剩余的草地对于保护草地鸟类种群至关重要。自1980年以来,北美已失去的草原数量得到了充分的记录,持续和惊人的记录,而1990年代之前杀虫剂的使用却大大减少了。草原鸟类可能会从农业实践的集约化和牧场,保护区计划土地,牧场和其他草原生境的散布到现有的农业景观中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号