首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Model-Based and Model-Free Pavlovian Reward Learning: Revaluation Revision and Revelation
【2h】

Model-Based and Model-Free Pavlovian Reward Learning: Revaluation Revision and Revelation

机译:基于模型和免费模型的巴甫洛夫奖赏学习:重估修订和启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Evidence supports at least two methods for learning about reward and punishment and making predictions for guiding actions. One method, called model-free, progressively acquires cached estimates of the long-run values of circumstances and actions from retrospective experience. The other method, called model-based, uses representations of the environment, expectations and prospective calculations to make cognitive predictions of future value. Extensive attention has been paid to both methods in computational analyses of instrumental learning. By contrast, although a full computational analysis has been lacking, Pavlovian learning and prediction has typically been presumed to be solely model-free. Here, we revise that presumption and review compelling evidence from Pavlovian revaluation experiments showing that Pavlovian predictions can involve their own form of model-based evaluation. In model-based Pavlovian evaluation, prevailing states of the body and brain influence value computations, and thereby produce powerful incentive motivations that can sometimes be quite new. We consider the consequences of this revised Pavlovian view for the computational landscape of prediction, response and choice. We also revisit differences between Pavlovian and instrumental learning in the control of incentive motivation.
机译:证据至少支持两种方法来学习奖励和惩罚,并为指导行动做出预测。一种方法称为无模型,它从追溯经验中逐步获取对环境和操作的长期价值的缓存估计。另一种方法称为基于模型的方法,它使用环境的表示形式,期望值和前瞻性计算来对未来价值进行认知预测。在工具学习的计算分析中已经广泛关注这两种方法。相比之下,尽管缺乏完整的计算分析,但通常假定巴甫洛夫式的学习和预测是完全无模型的。在这里,我们修改了推定,并回顾了巴甫洛夫重估实验的有力证据,这些证据表明巴甫洛夫的预测可能涉及其自身的基于模型的评估形式。在基于模型的巴甫洛夫式评估中,身体和大脑的普遍状态影响价值计算,从而产生有时可能是相当新的强大激励动机。我们考虑了这种修改后的巴甫洛夫观点对预测,响应和选择的计算前景的影响。我们还回顾了在激励动机控制方面,巴甫洛夫学习法和工具学习法之间的差异。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Peter Dayan; Kent C. Berridge;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(14),2
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 473–492
  • 总页数 33
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号