首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease
【2h】

Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson’s disease

机译:决策和多巴胺能系统:ERPs研究爱荷华州帕金森氏病赌博任务

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Recent researches reported behavioral and emotional impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD), even in the earliest stages. This impairment affects also decision-making and learning processes. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is commonly used to examine the decision-making capacity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the neural correlates of feedback evaluation in the decision-making process into a learning context, using IGT and event-related potentials (ERPs) in a group of non-demented medicated PD patients. Fifteen PD patients and 15 healthy controls were recruited for the study. PD patients were administrated a basic neuropsychological assessment oriented to exclude cognitive impairments. Both groups underwent the computerized IGT during electroencephalography (EEG) registration. To analyse ERPs, continuous EEG data were epoched within a time-window starting 1000 ms before and ending 1000 ms after feedback presentation and averaged separately for positive (i.e., win condition) and negative (i.e., loss condition) feedbacks. Behavioral data revealed a significant lower performance of PD patients (p < 0.05) compared with the controls. While controls demonstrated a correct feedback evaluation, PD patients did not show any learning, selecting more disadvantageous decks even in the last part of task. Furthermore, ERPs results revealed that controls showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in ERPs morphology recorded after the win and the loss conditions, suggesting that positive and negative feedbacks were differently evaluated and processed. PD patients showed a different pattern: their ERPs morphology was the same for positive and negative feedback. Interestingly, our ERPs results suggest that in PD patients an incorrect evaluation of context-relevant outcomes could be the reason of a poor performance in decision-making tasks, and could explain cognitive and behavioral problems related to impulse control disorder.
机译:最近的研究报道,即使在早期阶段,帕金森氏病(PD)的行为和情感障碍也是如此。这种损害也会影响决策和学习过程。爱荷华州的赌博任务(IGT)通常用于检查决策能力。本研究的目的是在一组非痴呆药PD患者中研究IGT和事件相关电位(ERP),以研究决策过程向学习环境中反馈评估的神经相关性。招募了15名PD患者和15名健康对照者用于研究。对PD患者进行了基本的神经心理学评估,以排除认知障碍。两组均在脑电图(EEG)注册期间接受了计算机化的IGT。为了分析ERP,在一个时间窗口内提取了连续的EEG数据,该时间窗从反馈呈现之前的1000毫秒开始,到反馈呈现之后的1000毫秒结束,然后分别对正反馈(即获胜条件)和负反馈(即损失条件)进行平均。行为数据显示,与对照组相比,PD患者的表现显着降低(p <0.05)。尽管对照组显示出正确的反馈评估,但PD患者没有任何学习经验,即使在任务的最后部分也选择了更多不利的组套。此外,ERP的结果显示,在获胜和损失情况发生后,控件记录的ERPs形态存在显着差异(p <0.05),这表明对正反馈和负反馈的评估和处理方式有所不同。 PD患者表现出不同的模式:正反馈和负反馈的ERP形态相同。有趣的是,我们的ERP结果表明,在PD患者中,与上下文相关的结果评估不正确可能是决策任务表现不佳的原因,并且可以解释与冲动控制障碍有关的认知和行为问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号