首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Distinct Brain Mechanisms Support Spatial vs. Temporal Filtering of Nociceptive Information
【2h】

Distinct Brain Mechanisms Support Spatial vs. Temporal Filtering of Nociceptive Information

机译:不同的脑机制支持伤害性信息的空间和时间过滤。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The role of endogenous analgesic mechanisms has largely been viewed in the context of gain modulation during nociceptive processing. However, these analgesic mechanisms may play critical roles in the extraction and subsequent utilization of information related to spatial and temporal features of nociceptive input. To date, it remains unknown if spatial and temporal filtering of nociceptive information is supported by similar analgesic mechanisms. To address this question, human volunteers were recruited to assess brain activation with functional MRI during conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and offset analgesia (OA). CPM provides one paradigm for assessing spatial filtering of nociceptive information while OA provides a paradigm for assessing temporal filtering of nociceptive information. CPM and OA both produced statistically significant reductions in pain intensity. However, the magnitude of pain reduction elicited by CPM was not correlated with that elicited by OA across different individuals. Different patterns of brain activation were consistent with the psychophysical findings. CPM elicited widespread reductions in regions engaged in nociceptive processing such as the thalamus, insula and SII. OA produced reduced activity in SI, but was associated with greater activation in the anterior insula, dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex, intra-parietal sulcus, and inferior parietal lobule relative to CPM. In the brainstem, CPM consistently produced reductions in activity while OA produced increases in activity. Conjunction analysis confirmed that CPM related activity did not overlap with that of OA. Thus, dissociable mechanisms support inhibitory processes engaged during spatial vs. temporal filtering of nociceptive information.
机译:内源性镇痛机制的作用已在伤害感受过程中的增益调节方面得到广泛关注。但是,这些镇痛机制可能在伤害性输入的时空特征相关信息的提取和后续利用中起关键作用。迄今为止,尚不清楚类似的镇痛机制是否支持伤害性信息的时空过滤。为了解决这个问题,招募了人类志愿者来评估在条件性疼痛调节(CPM)和抵消镇痛(OA)期间通过功能性MRI进行的大脑激活。 CPM提供了一种评估伤害感受信息的空间过滤的范例,而OA提供了一种评估伤害感受信息的时间过滤的范例。 CPM和OA均使疼痛强度明显降低。但是,CPM引起的疼痛减轻幅度与OA引起的不同个体疼痛减轻幅度不相关。脑部激活的不同模式与心理生理发现一致。 CPM引起参与伤害性加工的区域(如丘脑,绝缘体和SII)普遍减少。 OA导致SI的活性降低,但与CPM相比,前岛岛,背外侧前额叶皮层,顶叶内沟和顶叶小叶的活化更高。在脑干中,CPM持续产生活动减少,而OA产生活动增加。合并分析证实,CPM相关活动与OA不重叠。因此,可分离的机制支持在伤害性信息的空间与时间过滤过程中参与的抑制过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号