首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Traditional vs Modern: Role of Breed Type in Determining Enteric Methane Emissions from Cattle Grazing as Part of Contrasting Grassland-Based Systems
【2h】

Traditional vs Modern: Role of Breed Type in Determining Enteric Methane Emissions from Cattle Grazing as Part of Contrasting Grassland-Based Systems

机译:传统与现代:作为基于草地的系统对比的一部分品种类型在确定牛放牧产生的肠甲烷排放中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ruminant livestock turn forages and poor-quality feeds into human edible products, but enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants are a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (GHGs) and hence to climate change. Despite the predominance of pasture-based beef production systems in many parts of Europe there are little data available regarding enteric CH4 emissions from free-ranging grazing cattle. It is possible that differences in physiology or behaviour could influence comparative emissions intensities for traditional and modern breed types depending on the nutritional characteristics of the herbage grazed. This study investigated the role of breed type in influencing CH4 emissions from growing beef steers managed on contrasting grasslands typical of intensive (lowland) and extensive (upland) production systems. Using the SF6 dilution technique CH4 emissions were estimated for a modern, fast-growing crossbred (Limousin cross) and a smaller and hardier native breed (Welsh Black) when grazing lowland perennial ryegrass (high nutritional density, low sward heterogeneity) and semi-improved upland pasture (low/medium nutritional density, high sward heterogeneity). Live-weight gain was substantially lower for steers on the upland system compared to the lowland system (0.31 vs. 1.04 kg d−1; s.e.d. = 0.085 kg d−1; P<0.001), leading to significant differences in estimated dry matter intakes (8.0 vs. 11.1 kg DM d−1 for upland and lowland respectively; s.e.d. = 0.68 kg DM d−1; P<0.001). While emissions per unit feed intake were similar for the lowland and upland systems, CH4 emissions per unit of live-weight gain (LWG) were substantially higher when the steers grazed the poorer quality hill pasture (760 vs 214 g kg−1 LWG; s.e.d. = 133.5 g kg−1 LWG; P<0.001). Overall any effects of breed type were relatively small relative to the combined influence of pasture type and location.
机译:反刍动物将草料和劣质饲料变成人类可食用产品,但反刍动物产生的肠甲烷(CH4)排放是造成温室气体(GHG)并因此导致气候变化的重要因素。尽管在欧洲许多地方,以牧场为基础的牛肉生产系统占主导地位,但关于放养放牧牛的肠道CH4排放量的数据很少。生理或行为上的差异可能会影响放牧的牧草的营养特性,从而影响传统和现代品种类型的相对排放强度。这项研究调查了在集约化(低地)和集约化(高地)生产系统的典型草地上进行管理的品种类型在影响生长的公牛的CH4排放中的作用。使用SF6稀释技术,估算了当牧草低地多年生黑麦草(高营养密度,低草皮异质性)和半改良时,现代,快速生长的杂交种(利木赞杂交)和更小,更坚硬的本地品种(威尔士黑)的CH4排放量。高地牧场(营养密度低/中,草皮异质性高)。与低地系统相比,高地系统的ers牛活重增长显着降低(0.31比1.04 kg d -1 ; sed = 0.085 kg d -1 ; P <0.001),导致估计的干物质摄入量有显着差异(高地和低地分别为8.0和11.1 kg DM d -1 ; sed = 0.68 kg DM d -1 ) sup>; P <0.001)。虽然低地和高地系统的单位饲料摄入量排放量相似,但当公牛放牧质量较差的山地牧场时,单位活重增加(LWG)的CH4排放量显着更高(760 vs 214 g kgsup−1 LWG; sed = 133.5 g kg -1 LWG; P <0.001)。总体而言,相对于牧场类型和位置的综合影响,品种类型的影响相对较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号