首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Codifying Collegiality: Recent Developments in Data Sharing Policy in the Life Sciences
【2h】

Codifying Collegiality: Recent Developments in Data Sharing Policy in the Life Sciences

机译:编纂共同性:生命科学中数据共享策略的最新发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the last decade, there have been significant changes in data sharing policies and in the data sharing environment faced by life science researchers. Using data from a 2013 survey of over 1600 life science researchers, we analyze the effects of sharing policies of funding agencies and journals. We also examine the effects of new sharing infrastructure and tools (i.e., third party repositories and online supplements). We find that recently enacted data sharing policies and new sharing infrastructure and tools have had a sizable effect on encouraging data sharing. In particular, third party repositories and online supplements as well as data sharing requirements of funding agencies, particularly the NIH and the National Human Genome Research Institute, were perceived by scientists to have had a large effect on facilitating data sharing. In addition, we found a high degree of compliance with these new policies, although noncompliance resulted in few formal or informal sanctions. Despite the overall effectiveness of data sharing policies, some significant gaps remain: about one third of grant reviewers placed no weight on data sharing plans in their reviews, and a similar percentage ignored the requirements of material transfer agreements. These patterns suggest that although most of these new policies have been effective, there is still room for policy improvement.
机译:在过去的十年中,生命科学研究人员所面临的数据共享策略和数据共享环境发生了重大变化。利用2013年对1600多名生命科学研究者进行的调查得出的数据,我们分析了资助机构和期刊共享政策的影响。我们还将研究新的共享基础架构和工具(即第三方存储库和在线补充)的影响。我们发现,最近颁布的数据共享策略以及新的共享基础结构和工具对鼓励数据共享产生了巨大影响。尤其是,科学家认为,第三方存储库和在线补充资料以及资助机构(尤其是NIH和国家人类基因组研究所)的数据共享要求对促进数据共享产生了巨大影响。此外,尽管不遵守规定导致很少的正式或非正式制裁,但我们高度遵守了这些新政策。尽管数据共享策略总体上有效,但仍存在一些重大差距:大约三分之一的赠款审核者在其审核中不重视数据共享计划,并且有类似的百分比忽略了材料转让协议的要求。这些模式表明,尽管这些新政策中的大多数已生效,但仍有改进政策的空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号