首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Separating Macroecological Pattern and Process: Comparing Ecological Economic and Geological Systems
【2h】

Separating Macroecological Pattern and Process: Comparing Ecological Economic and Geological Systems

机译:分离宏观生态模式和过程:比较生态经济和地质系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theories of biodiversity rest on several macroecological patterns describing the relationship between species abundance and diversity. A central problem is that all theories make similar predictions for these patterns despite disparate assumptions. A troubling implication is that these patterns may not reflect anything unique about organizational principles of biology or the functioning of ecological systems. To test this, we analyze five datasets from ecological, economic, and geological systems that describe the distribution of objects across categories in the United States. At the level of functional form (‘first-order effects’), these patterns are not unique to ecological systems, indicating they may reveal little about biological process. However, we show that mechanism can be better revealed in the scale-dependency of first-order patterns (‘second-order effects’). These results provide a roadmap for biodiversity theory to move beyond traditional patterns, and also suggest ways in which macroecological theory can constrain the dynamics of economic systems.
机译:生物多样性理论基于描述物种丰度与多样性之间关系的几种宏观生态模式。一个中心问题是,尽管有不同的假设,但所有理论都对这些模式做出了类似的预测。一个令人不安的暗示是,这些模式可能无法反映出有关生物学的组织原理或生态系统功能的独特之处。为了测试这一点,我们分析了来自生态,经济和地质系统的五个数据集,这些数据集描述了美国不同类别对象的分布。就功能形式(“一阶效应”)而言,这些模式并非生态系统所独有,这表明它们对生物学过程的了解很少。但是,我们表明,可以通过一阶模式(“二阶效应”)的比例依赖性更好地揭示这种机制。这些结果为生物多样性理论超越传统模式提供了路线图,还提出了宏观生态学理论可以约束经济系统动态的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号