首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Handedness influences intermanual transfer in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
【2h】

Handedness influences intermanual transfer in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

机译:惯性会影响黑猩猩(盘尾猿)的手间转移但不会影响恒河猴(猕猴)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Intermanual transfer refers to an effect whereby training one hand to perform a motor task improves performance in the opposite untrained hand. We tested the hypothesis that handedness facilitates intermanual transfer in two nonhuman primate species: rhesus monkeys (N = 13) and chimpanzees (N = 52). Subjects were grouped into one of four conditions: (1) left-handers trained with the left (dominant) hand; (2) left-handers trained with the right (non-dominant) hand; (3) right-handers trained with the left (non-dominant) hand; and (4) right-handers trained with the right (dominant) hand. Intermanual transfer was measured using a task where subjects removed a Life Savers® candy (monkeys) or a washer (chimpanzees) from metal shapes. Transfer was measured with latency by comparing the average time taken to solve the task in the first session with the trained hand compared to the first session with the untrained hand. Hypotheses and predictions were derived from three models of transfer: access: benefit training with non-dominant hand; proficiency: benefit training with dominant hand; and cross-activation: benefit irrespective of trained hand. Intermanual transfer (i.e., shorter latency in untrained hand) occurred regardless of whether monkeys trained with the dominant hand or non-dominant hand, supporting the cross-activation model. However, transfer was only observed in chimpanzees that trained with the dominant hand. When handedness groups were examined separately, the transfer effect was only significant for right-handed chimpanzees, partially supporting the proficiency model. Findings may be related to neurophysiological differences in motor control as well as differences in handedness patterning between rhesus monkeys and chimpanzees.
机译:相互转移是指一种效果,通过训练一只手来执行运动任务,可以提高另一只未经训练的手的性能。我们测试了在两个非人类灵长类动物中,惯用性有助于人际转移的假说:恒河猴(N = 13)和黑猩猩(N = 52)。将受试者分为以下四个条件之一:(1)用左(显性)手训练的左撇子; (2)用右(非显性)手训练的左撇子; (3)用左手(非优势)训练的右手运动员; (4)用右手(优势)训练的右手。使用一项任务来测量人际间的转移,在该任务中,受试者从金属形状中移走了生命保护者糖果(猴子)或洗衣机(黑猩猩)。通过比较在训练有素的手在第一节中与在未经训练的手的第一节中完成任务所花费的平均时间,用延迟来衡量转移。假设和预测是从三种转移模型得出的:获取:非主导手的利益训练;获取和转移。熟练:专项优势培训;和交叉激活:无论受过训练的手如何,收益都是如此。无论采用优势手还是非优势手训练的猴子都进行了手间转移(即,未经训练的手的潜伏期较短),从而支持了交叉激活模型。但是,仅在惯用手训练的黑猩猩中观察到了转移。当分别对惯用性组进行检查时,仅右手黑猩猩的转移效果显着,部分支持了熟练程度模型。这些发现可能与运动控制的神经生理学差异以及恒河猴和黑猩猩之间的惯性模式差异有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号