首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of Methyl Bromide Alternatives Efficacy against Soil-Borne Pathogens Nematodes and Soil Microbial Community
【2h】

Evaluation of Methyl Bromide Alternatives Efficacy against Soil-Borne Pathogens Nematodes and Soil Microbial Community

机译:评估甲基溴替代品对土壤致病菌线虫和土壤微生物群落的功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Methyl bromide (MB) and other alternatives were evaluated for suppression of Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp., and Meloidogyne spp. and their influence on soil microbial communities. Both Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. were significantly reduced by the MB (30.74 mg kg-1), methyl iodide (MI: 45.58 mg kg-1), metham sodium (MS: 53.92 mg kg-1) treatments. MS exhibited comparable effectiveness to MB in controlling Meloidogyne spp. and total nematodes, followed by MI at the tested rate. By contrast, sulfuryl fluoride (SF: 33.04 mg kg-1) and chloroform (CF: 23.68 mg kg-1) showed low efficacy in controlling Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp., and Meloidogyne spp. MB, MI and MS significantly lowered the abundance of different microbial populations and microbial biomass in soil, whereas SF and CF had limited influence on them compared with the control. Diversity indices in Biolog studies decreased in response to fumigation, but no significant difference was found among treatments in PLFA studies. Principal component and cluster analyses of Biolog and PLFA data sets revealed that MB and MI treatments greatly influenced the soil microbial community functional and structural diversity compared with SF treatment. These results suggest that fumigants with high effectiveness in suppressing soil-borne disease could significantly influence soil microbial community.
机译:评估了甲基溴(MB)和其他替代品对镰刀菌,疫霉菌和根结线虫的抑制作用。及其对土壤微生物群落的影响。两者均为镰刀菌。和疫霉菌属。 MB(30.74 mg kg -1 ),甲基碘(MI:45.58 mg kg -1 ),甲胺钠(MS:53.92 mg kg > -1 )处理。 MS在控制根结线虫属中表现出与MB相当的功效。和总线虫,其次是MI,以测试的速度进行。相比之下,硫酰氟(SF:33.04 mg kg -1 )和氯仿(CF:23.68 mg kg -1 )对镰刀菌,疫霉菌的防治效果低。 。和Meloidogyne spp。 MB,MI和MS显着降低了土壤中不同微生物种群和微生物生物量的丰度,而SF和CF与对照相比对它们的影响有限。 Biolog研究中的多样性指数随熏蒸而下降,但PLFA研究中的处理之间没有发现显着差异。对Biolog和PLFA数据集的主成分和聚类分析表明,与SF处理相比,MB和MI处理对土壤微生物群落功能和结构多样性影响很大。这些结果表明,具有高抑制土壤传播疾病效力的熏蒸剂可以显着影响土壤微生物群落。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号