首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Contrasting Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Diversity Responses to Forest Modifications: Comparisons of Taxa and Successive Plant Life Stages in South African Scarp Forest
【2h】

Contrasting Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Diversity Responses to Forest Modifications: Comparisons of Taxa and Successive Plant Life Stages in South African Scarp Forest

机译:不同的分类学和系统发育多样性对森林改造的响应:南非鳞茎森林的分类单元和连续植物生命阶段的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The degradation of natural forests to modified forests threatens subtropical and tropical biodiversity worldwide. Yet, species responses to forest modification vary considerably. Furthermore, effects of forest modification can differ, whether with respect to diversity components (taxonomic or phylogenetic) or to local (α-diversity) and regional (β-diversity) spatial scales. This real-world complexity has so far hampered our understanding of subtropical and tropical biodiversity patterns in human-modified forest landscapes. In a subtropical South African forest landscape, we studied the responses of three successive plant life stages (adult trees, saplings, seedlings) and of birds to five different types of forest modification distinguished by the degree of within-forest disturbance and forest loss. Responses of the two taxa differed markedly. Thus, the taxonomic α-diversity of birds was negatively correlated with the diversity of all plant life stages and, contrary to plant diversity, increased with forest disturbance. Conversely, forest disturbance reduced the phylogenetic α-diversity of all plant life stages but not that of birds. Forest loss neither affected taxonomic nor phylogenetic diversity of any taxon. On the regional scale, taxonomic but not phylogenetic β-diversity of both taxa was well predicted by variation in forest disturbance and forest loss. In contrast to adult trees, the phylogenetic diversity of saplings and seedlings showed signs of contemporary environmental filtering. In conclusion, forest modification in this subtropical landscape strongly shaped both local and regional biodiversity but with contrasting outcomes. Phylogenetic diversity of plants may be more threatened than that of mobile species such as birds. The reduced phylogenetic diversity of saplings and seedlings suggests losses in biodiversity that are not visible in adult trees, potentially indicating time-lags and contemporary shifts in forest regeneration. The different responses of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity to forest modifications imply that biodiversity conservation in this subtropical landscape requires the preservation of natural and modified forests.
机译:天然林退化为改性林威胁着全世界的亚热带和热带生物多样性。但是,物种对森林改造的反应差异很大。此外,无论是在多样性组成部分(分类学还是系统发育)或局部(α-多样性)和区域(β-多样性)空间尺度上,森林改造的效果都可能不同。迄今为止,这种现实世界的复杂性妨碍了我们对人工改造森林景观中亚热带和热带生物多样性模式的理解。在亚热带的南非森林景观中,我们研究了三个连续的植物生命阶段(成年树,幼树,幼苗)和鸟类对五种不同类型的森林改造的响应,这些变化以森林内部扰动和森林流失的程度来区分。这两个分类单元的反应明显不同。因此,鸟类的分类学α多样性与所有植物生命阶段的多样性呈负相关,并且与植物多样性相反,随着森林干扰而增加。相反,森林干扰降低了所有植物生命阶段的系统发育α多样性,但没有降低鸟类的系统多样性。森林流失既不会影响任何分类单元的分类学和系统发育多样性。在区域尺度上,通过扰动和森林流失的变化可以很好地预测两个分类群的分类学而非系统发育的β多样性。与成年树相反,幼树和幼苗的系统发育多样性显示出当代环境过滤的迹象。总而言之,在这种亚热带景观中进行的森林改造强烈地影响了当地和区域的生物多样性,但结果却截然相反。植物的系统发生多样性可能比鸟类等活动物种的系统发生多样性受到的威胁更大。幼树和幼苗的系统发育多样性降低表明,成年树木中看不到生物多样性的丧失,这可能表明时滞和当代森林更新的变化。分类学和系统发育多样性对森林改良的不同反应表明,在这种亚热带景观中保护生物多样性需要自然和改良森林的保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号