首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior >Facilitation and suppression of human loss-avoidance by signaled unavoidable loss
【2h】

Facilitation and suppression of human loss-avoidance by signaled unavoidable loss

机译:通过信号的不可避免的损失促进和抑制避免人类损失

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A 15-sec stimulus followed by unavoidable monetary loss was presented to human subjects who were avoiding loss on a free-operant schedule. As has been observed in studies where shock is the aversive event, initial reactions to the pre-loss stimulus were transient increases in overall and stimulus rates. Unlike shock studies, continued training produced decreased rates, in the presence of the 15-sec stimulus, which were maintained in two of three subjects. Subsequent observations indicated that lowered rates were a function of the subject's rate of avoidance responding, the duration of the stimulus, and the scheduling of avoidable losses. Increasing the duration of the stimulus eliminated lowered rates in the presence of the stimulus and subsequent exposures to conditions which previously produced lowered rates did not result in recovery of the phenomenon. Introduction of the pre-loss stimulus on an extinction baseline (avoidable losses were omitted), however, reinstituted lowered rates. It is proposed that the pre-loss stimulus assumed discriminative control over low rates because responding in the presence of the stimulus was ineffective in avoiding the unavoidable loss. Recovery from lowered rates is attributed to the occurrence of avoidable losses during the stimulus period, and maintenance of lowered rates on the extinction schedule to the omission of such avoidable losses.
机译:向避免按自由经营者计划蒙受损失的人类受试者提供了15秒钟的刺激,随后不可避免的金钱损失。正如在研究中以电击为厌恶事件所观察到的那样,对失落前刺激的最初反应是总体和刺激率的短暂增加。与休克研究不同,在存在15秒刺激的情况下,持续训练产生的速率降低,三个受试者中的两个保持了这种刺激。随后的观察表明,降低的比率是受治疗者的回避反应率,刺激持续时间和可避免损失的时间表的函数。增加刺激的持续时间消除了存在刺激的情况下降低的速率,并且随后暴露于先前产生降低的速率的条件下不会导致现象的恢复。在灭绝基线上引入损失前刺激(避免了可避免的损失),但是重新降低了利率。有人提出,损失前的刺激应采取歧视性的低利率控制措施,因为在存在刺激的情况下作出反应无法避免不可避免的损失。从降低的利率中恢复的原因是在刺激期内发生了可避免的损失,而在灭绝时间表上维持了降低的利率是由于省略了这种可避免的损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号